Tass doesn‘t have a good track record (as shown - with proof - on Wikipedia), it usually perpetuates the view of the Russian govt. Not a quality anybody should be looking for when seeking out real journalism.

The good thing is that there is no one „Western media“, I‘m not asking you to trust exclusively one platform. Still, a news agency backed by a government that is known for spreading misinformation is an agency you wouldn‘t trust, regardlesd of what specific government it is backed by.

Beware! Tass isn‘t a particulary trustworthy news agency (backed by russian gov, as far as I can tell) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TASS

Good to know some things never change, this feels like real whacky future internet history.

Are 70 bugfixes generally many bugfixes? (Just asking for a friend)

I think it stems from me not understanding the Non free network services anti-feature in F-Droid when I first saw the app. As well as the fact that I thought that a part of the app is not fully open source. I did some minimal research and found out that the ui of the app is licensed under cc no redistribution and noncomercial. From a security/ privacy standpoint this is not a problem for me (since the code is not a black box)and it seems to benefit the developers which seems unproblematic and quite nice.

TLDR: I didn‘t do any research/ didn‘t understand fdroids anti-features

I use a few apps on my phone (degoogled android): -StreetComplete: highlights missing information, no knowledge about tagging required -EveryDoor: excellent poi/ micromapping -Vespucci: very feature rich, I use it for everything else (e.g.funny edge cases)

-Organic maps: works fine, bad public transport support where I live, couldn‘t get spoken directions to work ; I chose it over OSMand because of the smaller download size and because OSMand seemed kinda shady to me (are they?).