![](https://lemmynsfw.com/pictrs/image/9daad9ca-7d84-4c96-ab0c-731d8a1c3d92.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/9e1c89e6-e9e4-4a48-819e-c725d75e70c9.png)
You are absolutely right , wanted to correct that too but
Right now on mobile trying to edit is such a pain in the arse.
You are absolutely right , wanted to correct that too but
Right now on mobile trying to edit is such a pain in the arse.
You are absolutely right , wanted to correct that too but
Right now on mobile trying to edit is such a pain in the arse.
Very interesting points, i have a (noob) question about point n.2. Could the question about GDPR can be circumvented by having a anonymous profile ? Could this be applied to other platforms?
Very good example , they create/do/make something nice and find a way to ruin it showing (again) what is their end goal is : lock the cow in their garden to keep on milking it to death
Meta can and will pay for it. They have enough funds to run their own instance.
I am reposting my answer from another thread : Nothing good will come from meta ( or any other Gafa Microsoft included), ever. They will alway look for a way to corrupt any social media to their favor in order try to dominate the Web. At this point of the internet history anyone giving a speck of trust to them is dream walking into a disaster waiting to happen. There are already trying to bring Insta and activityPub service lol , and they didn’t haven’t started yet.
Nothing good will come from meta, ever. They will alway look for a way to corrupt any social media to their favor in order try to dominate the Web. At this point of the internet history anyone giving a speck of trust to them is dream walking into a disaster waiting to happen.
Is it possible to defederate them as a preventive measure?
french government taking notes