![](https://lemmygrad.ml/pictrs/image/482c74ac-d579-4f6b-bd49-aa0fc54d7917.png)
![](https://lemmygrad.ml/pictrs/image/47264c96-e60a-4677-88b2-56b179ded33d.png)
I guess you can sidestep this by not recognizing the existence of Israel as a legitimate nation-state?
Nops :-( A state it’s a political construct, as national identity is a social construct. The recognition could be used against the state, but not against the national identity.
But what I was trying to point out was the false dichotomy presented: Israel is genocidal and so is Hamas.
Israel has the material conditions to commit genocide, Hamas does not. At most, Hamas could commit massacres in some settlements, which I don’t see it fits the definition of genocide.
If we ignore that fact, we can use the political program of Hamas, but it also don’t call for a genocide of jews or Israelians, even seems that they could reluctantly accept a 2-state solution.
Yes. Why is this post downvoted?