![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmygrad.ml/pictrs/image/qDUR8bPrcn.png)
Yeah, I mean desktop environment when I say “UI.” It’s less about customizability and more about stability for me. Dolphin just crashes way too much for me in KDE Plasma. Like, anytime I do a search. I just go to the command line instead, which is unfortunate for a UI.
Compositing with X server is a mess with multiple monitors running with different refresh rates. Need to try Wayland and see if that’s any better.
Also the snap-to on the edges for organizing multiple windows isn’t quite as smooth. Still a million times better than Mac OSX.
But, it’s open, free, comparable to Windows DE, and yeah you’re right, much more customizable.
Also to be fair it’s been awhile since I’ve given Gnome or some other DE a shot.
Income is a different variable, a different kind of classification. YouTubers’ relation to how they make their income is basically always proletariat or petite bourgeoisie.
Whether they are “aristocratic” because of their income levels is another dimension or classification, one that intersects with the relationship to the means of production, but does not sit side by side with it. This is hinted at in your description “labour aristocrat” - it is a compound class, the combination of labour (working class) and wealthy (income class).