Agree 100%. I think stuff by libs should be removed and stuff my comrades should be replied to with comments. Downvotes add nothing

The good thing about upvoting is it makes the best content go to the top. I say get rid of downvotes entirely and hide upvotes. So they still function but don’t display a score

Comments that don’t deserve responses should be removed

Doesn’t the chances of Iraq joining seem incredibly low?

Terrorism is a useless catch all phrase

And if someone says they are annoyed by the behavior of LGBT people then it is justified in the same way?

Shut the fuck up

100% No to both questions

Antinatalism refers to those who oppose having kids on principal. If it’s for monetary reasons then it isn’t antinatalism

Is it the same thing with gay people? The same logic?

Okay, good. Sorry, maybe I misinterpreted what you were trying to say and didn’t read it correctly. My apologies

Yeah, without trolls from .world even the .ee and .ml posts have been far better

Having irritating personal interactions doesn’t allow one to blanketly have a negative opinion of humanity. Finding all of humanity annoying is a conservative thought line Hint: i when it’s everyone else, it’s normally not everyone else

Anti-natalism seems to be approaching certain fascist brainworms to me. I should certainly hope that no one here needs to be reminded that it’s a bullshit ideology

If someone is annoyed by people in general then they need to get over themselves. I have no other advice in such a situation

And what right have you to state agreement with a comment saying that kids are annoying? Shall it be fine with you when people make comments calling other groups annoying based off of their unchosen characteristics?

What an incredibly rude and ridiculous statement. The very fact you would say something like that only points to me that you are far more annoying than any child I’ve ever been around.

Generally anarchism does reject the idea of authority wholesale whilst also having no historical basis for it. Those societies were clearly in a very different place. I suggest you look into dialects as they will provide comprehensive explanations as to authority and its foundations (and why there are different conditions then than now) especially seeing as they fully had “coercive” authority. Now as to what non-coercive authority is, I don’t think even the anarchists have cracked that one

I wouldnt get it because it’s ridiculous and illogical

That’s the same logic as saying that In going to kill 5 people and it’s fine because i’m not killing 20