They / them
Intersectionality is a great analytical tool. Jewish Voice for Peace found themselves to be in the intersection of being both Jewish and anti-zionists. German government policies and often German people (even from the left or antifa), fail take this intersection into consideration.
But do we really need this analytical tool for this topic? When a person knows the historical relation between zionism and fascism, why would they support zionists or zionist policies?
I thought it would be important to include the following link:
Jewish Voice for Peace - Our Approach to Zionism
While it had many strains historically, the Zionism that took hold and stands today is a settler-colonial movement, establishing an apartheid state where Jews have more rights than others. Our own history teaches us how dangerous this can be.
Palestinian dispossession and occupation are by design. Zionism has meant profound trauma for generations, systematically separating Palestinians from their homes, land, and each other. Zionism, in practice, has resulted in massacres of Palestinian people, ancient villages and olive groves destroyed, families who live just a mile away from each other separated by checkpoints and walls, and children holding onto the keys of the homes from which their grandparents were forcibly exiled.
I think it’s important that this article mentions this nonsensical movement called effective altruism.
Take a look at Times of Israel in MBFC
Amongst other things it says:
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: Israel
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
When covering the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, they usually are objective and cover both sides fairly, such as this: IDF strikes fresh Hamas targets after 2nd rocket fired from Gaza Strip. However, during the conflict of 2023, they were less objective, focusing on the objectives of the Israeli military. In general, the Times of Israel is factual with a slight left-leaning editorial bias.
This is not a joke, just check it out.
maybe just a re-write news site run by people without much experience
I think if it was several people at the beginning of their writing career on mainstream topics, they would gladly include their names.
OP is quite likely trying to promote it. Hopefully they come and engage here.
I am honestly looking forward to their repply
This is something that crossed my mind but it still doesn’t answer the question of who writes these mainstream articles. I also thought it could be something like a personal blog, but the number of daily published articles is too great to support this thought.
And the OP doesn’t seem to care to engage in replying to my questions so far.
honestly this is something that if if was written by a human and had a very good science article around it, I could still care less.
This is not a site that is focused on ecology tho and the OP is constantly posting from it. I have asked them these kind of questions in several of their posts on various topics and they have not bothered replying something.
Also there are topics that it is important for the author to hide their identity due to the content they write. This site is not related to that sort of content. On the contrary it has tones of articles related to events reported in mainstream media, but no authors anywhere.
You’re welcome!
@ernest thank you for the update and everything. Its great to hear your personal matter is kinda sorted.
I already have the moderation of several magazines so I won’t be able to contribute to that more, I think.
I am a little bit familiar with bug reporting, not in github tho. So I just created a github account and a codeberg to try and contribute. Of course I will have to spend time checking out the existing ones and familiarizing myself with the platforms. I say all this because if you or any of the active devs, have test cases or a specific area that you would like to check first or anything relevant, I would gladly do my best to help on demand.
I thought of adding a couple of sentences to clarify things:
CBDCs benefit the 1% of the population by controlling all the rest of us. It’s a two-tier system (retail CBDCs and wholesale CBDCs) and this is something that is rarely mentioned in mainstream articles.
Retail CBDCs will be linked to your digital ID and your digital wallet, and even tho the implementation may differ from country to country (i.e. Sweden’s e-krona vs China’s digital Yuan), the thing that will be common is that a centralised entity, will have total control of your digital wallet, including your ID & money. We can think of it as a point system in which all your credit can be erased, or go bellow zero, and your digital ID, can be destroyed with a click of a button.
When the conversation is about wholesale CBDCs, the talk is about how to make things easier for bank interoperability as well as how to facilitate the super-rich.
I don’t really understand the bénef of a central bank digital currency.
It benefits the 1% of the population by controlling all the rest of us. It’s a two-tier system (retail CBDCs and wholesale CBDCs) and this is something that is rarely mentioned in mainstream articles.
Retail CBDCs will be linked to your digital ID and your digital wallet, and even tho the implementation may differ from country to country (i.e. Sweden’s e-krona vs China’s digital Yuan), the thing that will be common is that a centralised entity, will have total control of your digital wallet, including your ID & money.
When the conversation is about wholesale CBDCs, the talk is about how to make things easier for bank interoperability as well as how to facilitate the super-rich.
@watyuhhgg this site you use all the time infoterkiniviral seems pretty dodgy. I start thinking that its content could be AI generated? I say this because:
Would really like your input on this. Or anyone’s actually that would have a clue on this matter
The mainstream articles often fail to mention the differentiation between retail and wholesale CBDCs. Here is a World Economic Forum document that clarifies some of the dystopic potentials of this differentiation:
Digital Currency Governance Consortium White Paper Series - 19 November 2021
Note: click on Download PDF to view, and go to page 181 for more details.
The mainstream articles often fail to mention the differentiation between retail and wholesale CBDCs. Here is a World Economic Forum document that clarifies some of the dystopic potentials of this differentiation:
Digital Currency Governance Consortium White Paper Series - 19 November 2021
Note: click on Download PDF to view, and go to page 181 for more details.
What I like about crypto are the aspects of decentralization and transparency. Meaning for a project to be transparent, it needs to be 100% open source, otherwise nobody can verify their claims. Worldcoin is one of those totally centralised project, that everyone should keep away From. I would call it a scam, cause the way I see things capitalism is a scam but I think a dystopian control project would be more accurate.
In the article it says:
Portugal joins Kenya, (…) in raising regulatory eyebrows
I’d say this is an understatement. Kenya spotted this and suspended it early August 2024. It was launched late July of the same year:
and to my understanding they haven’t changed their attitude since cause
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Yes, zionism does have that effect to a society, cause it’s settler colonialism.
deleted by creator
@watyuhhgg is this an AI generated news site? If not, who writes the articles?