• mibo80@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Idk, restricting access to anything is “conservative” in practice and at the heart. Conserving is the main action a ‘conservative’ must practice. Don’t eat too much food. Don’t drink too much alcohol (if any). Don’t have too much sex. i.e. conserve your wants and needs so as to… well, at this point they impart religious contexts to justify why it will be worth it to deny yourself in the end.

    If I were a conservative though, the part that would piss me off is when I find out my so-called “leaders” are engaging in the same loose activities I’ve been lead to feel guilty for having thought of and brother, that’s A LOT of conservatives. In just politics it’s almost always republicans, and in the church, it’s almost always the pastors/leadership. You conservatives have a lot of reconciliation to do if you ever expect to win an election fairly.

    • JethPeter@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Conserving doesn’t mean reducing, it means protecting what already exists. Restricting access to birth control, for example, I would not call politically conservative.

      Republicans have, at different points in time, been fairly forward leaning in their own way. Have a google of progressive policies implemented by republicans.

      Social conservatism is more akin to what you are describing rather than the conservative political movement (and has a large section of the republicans in its sway at the moment). The thing they are trying to protect is their own personal moral view of the world and in so doing they are willing to not conserve the current political system to achieve this goal.

    • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I hate to tell you friend. You aren’t conservative and that is okay. The other side is really not all that bad.

      So welcome.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s conservative in terms of government power.

      Like putting a conservative amount of jelly on your toast means a small amount. Putting a liberal amount of jelly on your toast means a large amount.

      The terms conservative and liberal refer to how much government jelly you’re putting on the toast of society.

      Someone who seeks to conserve things is a conservationist.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, this is quite wrong.

        Conservatives wish to maintain the status quo and pull back changes made to the status quo.

        Liberalism is an ideology of free-market Capitalism and personal liberty.

        Neither directly cares about the size of government as long as it stays within those boundaries.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Liberalism is the ideology of personal liberty, from which capitalist-like principles emerge (eg private property rights). It’s a small distinction but an important one in my opinion. Enlightenment philosophers didn’t set out to enslave humanity under the thumb of capitalism - they set out to create an idealistic ethic around the rights of the individual and accidentally created a new form of economic feudalism.

          • Cowbee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sure! They were wrong, of course, but that’s why I mentioned that it’s centered on personal liberty with the principles of Capitalism.

      • yata@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah but “putting a conservative amount of jelly on your toast” has nothing to do with being a conservationist, because “a conservative amount of government” isn’t what exist or has historically existed.

        I think your analogy is fundamentally flawed, because just because the words (“conservative amount of jelly” and “being a political conservative”) are same, they don’t have anything else in common.

        It is like when Republicans claim that the US isn’t a democracy, because they are afraid it means support for the Democrats. Two different words with different meanings.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        i had to scroll pretty far to find someone who actually knew what conservative meant. And only to find you’re downvoted!

        lol i hope people don’t vote like this irl or democracy is doomed