I read that charging at freeway rest stops is not allowed at the U.S. because commercial activity is prohibited by federal law at these locations. This is such a huge missed opportunity- rest stops are already at regular intervals on common travel corridors. This law should be ammended to create an exception for ev charging.

  • jasontronic@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most state DOTs don’t want to own and operate fueling stations for a number of reasons. They’re not set up to do this. The NEVI program will deploy fast charging g every 50 miles near places with amenities. Many at existing fuel retailers from the awards we have seen so far.

  • HandyMan131@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have you been to rest stops in the US? Most of them are pretty terrible. I’d much rather drive another mile off the interstate to somewhere with actual amenities and less chance of being murdered.

  • nforrest@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are a handful in California. They’re slow and unreliable so almost worse than not having them at all…

  • GrrrArrgh@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are chargers at some of the rest stops in California. I came across a number of them on a road trip from NorCal to SoCal.

    • perrochon@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are free. No commerce. Gov hand out.

      They are also slow. Unless you need to sleep, they are rarely worth it.

      • GrrrArrgh@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t know, they were all being ICEd by gas cars because they were a few feet closer to the restrooms than the other spaces.

  • PAJW@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, this makes sense. It makes more sense than NEVI, and would have been cheaper than NEVI.

    Which is why it didn’t happen.

  • bigevilgrape@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The mass pike had a bunch of rest stops with chargers that got decommissioned. Now some have supercharges. They all have gas stations and fast food. Ct has at least one rest stop with a gas station.

  • NVPcMan@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not all freeway rest stops are on federal land. Ones on state/tribal land can have whatever they want.

  • isnotrandy@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wondered why they don’t charge for the DCFCs at rest areas in California. I can drive to Vegas, Reno, Mexico, or Oregon for free using them

  • dinoroo@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of highway rest stops have Tesla Chargers. The one near me in Delaware does.

    • StewieGriffin26@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Different rules because it’s a turnpike with fees.

      I have used the EA station along one, kind of a weird setup.

  • Jman841@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Florida Turnpike rest stops have both Tesla and FPL chargers. I95 rest stops do not.

  • rosier9@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stop and think about why this law was created in the first place. Local businesses don’t want to be shut out of an enormous customer base. This isn’t likely to change anytime soon.

    • perrochon@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t help them…

      The chain gas stations and fast food places (and chargers) are right next to the freeway.

      Few people drive to town to find local businesses. And the locals now drive to the freeway to fuel up - which they wouldn’t do if they had to go all the way to the rest station.

      The gas station at the exit is not much less inconvenient than one at a rest stop, there are many more of them, and there is more choice than a rest stop would allow.

      That law didn’t do anything, and repelling it would be better for everyone.