• DrAnthony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s true, but you also have to consider that the 65+ block is a smaller chunk of the population, currently pegged at 16.8% whereas 18 to 44 accounts for 35.9%. The moves the GOP are making are definitely upsetting the 30-somethings too, especially since they have been on the student loan treadmill for over a decade in a lot of cases. Depending on where you look (my quick glance was from Pew) the millennial voting block was roughly equal to the 65+ in sheer count. It just makes zero logical sense to keep pushing way past the point of diminishing returns on trying to get more of the boomer vote at the cost of nearly every other demographic.

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It just makes zero logical sense to keep pushing way past the point of diminishing returns on trying to get more of the boomer vote at the cost of nearly every other demographic.

      And yet that is what the GOP is doing because they know seniors are a dependable block that will go out and vote for them.

      Based on your numbers, seniors represent roughly 50M people and when 70% of them vote, that’s 35M people. And a whole hell of a lot of them are Red.

      18-44 year olds represent 108M people, but if only about 30% of them vote, then that’s only 32M people. That is less than what the seniors represent at the polls but more importantly, I guarantee you that there are FAR more divisions in that younger group than there are with Seniors. A FAR lower percentage of them vote Blue.

      So by the math, what Republicans are doing is the right thing to do simply because young people just don’t vote. Americans are our own worst enemy.