• Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    From Robert Reich:

    Billie Eilish can’t run for president. She is under 35.Arnold Schwarzenegger can’t run for president. He was born in Austria.Donald Trump can’t run for president. He engaged in and supported an insurrection.It’s in the Constitution, folks.

    Eta: there was already a post on the Reich quote. https://lemmy.world/post/9894249

  • Syo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    We’re going to see if the country is run by laws, or this country is run by power. Too many have fantasized about ruling by power. Too long the opposition just blindly believed the system would check itself in an honor system. This case, from the home state of a confederate general, will reveal which path US chooses.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Every nation is run by both. That’s why the U.S. government was set up to have checks and balances. Clearly it’s not perfect, but no system is. At the end of the day, it’s a nation’s people that ultimately decide how their government behaves, even if that’s by apathy.

  • just_change_it@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ah the real test: will a conservative state obey the law or the party.

    Since we are ruled by the supreme court i’m not sure it will even matter.

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Virginia is pretty much purple now. Perhaps still more of a reddish purple, but definitely not the deep red it used to be.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    He should be held accountable for his actions. If this was anyone else, there wouldn’t even be much of a conversation. Nobody forced his goofy behind to do an insurrection.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    oh, i really hope that the Colorado decision sets off a domino effect of state after state removing Trump from the ballot. It wouldn’t even take many to succeed to ensure he’d lose in 2024… but, of course, if SCOTUS takes up the case, he could be off the ballot everywhere forever.

    • kool_newt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      –> i really hope that the Colorado decision sets off a domino effect

      Won’t be the first time! Amirite!!!

  • random65837@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    238
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, not good, that’s not how free elections work regardless of what you think of a candidate.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      104
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you don’t like the 14th amendment, push for a new amendment to repeal it. If you really believe trump didn’t engage in insurrection, push for congress to exonerated him with a 2/3 vote of the house as provided for in the 14th amendment.

      Trump, and anybody else, cannot ignore constitutional restrictions on office just b cause he’s popular.

    • ersatz@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s irrelevant what we think of Trump. It’s not about what we think of him personally or the fact that he’s a convicted rapist and also has a long history of racism. This is about the fact that he organized an attempt to overthrow the government. He tried to stop one of those free elections you love so much.

    • Urist@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s how the constitution works though. Are you saying the 14th amendment doesn’t apply to the president?

    • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The same would happen if your 18, not a naturally born citizen, or just didn’t meet the various state requirements for the primary.

    • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      If he is allowed to run for election, what prevents next candidate from hiring mafia to terrorize polling places?

      There is a reason constitution has insurrection clause in it and what clown and his people did fits perfectly to the provisions under it. Not using 14th amendment is an open invitation for dictatorship.

      • nao@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not using 14th amendment is an open invitation for dictatorship.

        That argument only works if what you want to achieve is not a dictatorship.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

      So unless Congress votes for him to be on the ballot, he shouldn’t be on the ballot

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not what we think, it’s what he did.

      Traitors, traditionally, receive no quarter. He should be walked to edge of a cliff and shot, if we are going by the “historical traditions of the US” as this SCOTUS has apparently mandated.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is how elections work for everyday criminals, and if people are being imprisoned for the actions of Trump, then why is Trump exempt from those rules?

      Criminals cannot vote except in select states. And it isn’t like the people haven’t fought for those rights. Republicans have put stops to them.

      This is more of a problem of Republican policy, eating at Republican actions.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s nothing stopping a convicted criminal from running, so long as they meet the usual requirements. Unless the crime is insurrection, where the 14th amendment kicks in. And Trump participated in Jan 6th so he’s out.

      • Bipta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is not the correct interpretation. There’s only insurrection that can get your banned - and that’s exactly what he did.

        • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          There’s only insurrection that can get your banned

          Could you please elaborate on this? I have no idea what you are trying to say here.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Okay so they typed “your” instead of “you” but the fact remains that there’s one action which can cause you to be banned from becoming President (or a congressperson) and that action is insurrection. It was perfectly clear.

            Other disqualifications (age, birthplace) aren’t under one’s control. Insurrection is a CHOICE.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes it is… The Constitution says so. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but those are the binding rules.

      • random65837@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        11 months ago

        Highly unlikely, everything done to this point has had getting him off the ballot in mind, being childishly dramatic and calling a bunch of idiots an “insurrection” was just too easy to pass up.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Notice that it was an insurrection long before anyone knew Trump would be trying to run for office again.

          He realized he was going to lose the election, tried to steal it, failed, and then tried to keep office even though he had lost the election. It was an absolute embarrassment to the country and the man is a disgrace. The fact that anyone wants to vote for him is a testament to how well the media is at getting people to think what they want.

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Care to expand on your statement?

      alleges that Trump was an “insurrectionist” and cites that he isn’t legally eligible to hold office under state and federal law

      This individual is asking the court to make a determination in whether Trump is eligible based on his involvement in January 6. That’s his right as a citizen, regardless of what you think of it.