• roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yo ho yo ho.

    I don’t understand how people paying for prime can stand that crappy prime video UI anyway.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago
      1. it’s basically fine and unoffensive ui to 99.9% of people
      2. people see it as functionally free because they bought prime for free delivery
      3. People don’t know how to pirate
      • rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m deep into the seven seas but I still use prime because a family member pays for it. Its a decent enough ui and has some live stuff I can throw on to keep kids entertained. However, I’ve already added the shows I watch on prime to my jellyfin server just because this change is going to make me not want to use it anymore.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yep. I don’t consider it as a valuable streaming platform. If they removed it from the general prime I would not buy it separately.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can understand 1 and 2, although, for 3, even though, most of my (nontechie) friends don’t know how to pirate, they know how to look up grey streaming sites like 123movies, sflix, fmovies, etc

      • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m a shameless sailor but my wife has it for the free shipping.

        Their menus are ass but I really like the actual player ui. Love pausing and seeing who is in the scene.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can’t agree with #1. The interface is that of Amazon’s regular storefront and it often mixes paid media in with the free stuff or has stupid stuff like seasons 2, 4, & 6 being free while 1, 3, & 5 are paid. Maybe it’s different in the TV apps, but the browser version is atrocious.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      When I still was paying for prime (cancelled it last price increase) I was pirating any prime videos as that was easier than dealing with the shitty prime video UI.

    • ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      The player interface is excellent. Being able to see who the actors are in each scene is one of my favorite UI features.

      I agree that finding a thing you want to watch is meh at best. Especially because they mix in rentals, purchasable content, and prime content all in the home interface window.

      That said, yo ho matey.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not to mention the shockingly bad picture quality.

      The 4k stuff isn’t terrible, but anything that’s in HD is bloody awful.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I pay for Amazon prime. The only time I watch Prime Video is every once in a while I wonder: is Stargate: Universe as terrible as I remember? And then I try watching it and remember that it is. 

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I honestly thought it wasn’t terrible and would have benefitted from fleshing out the rest of the story. It was definitely a huge departure from the styling of SGU and Atlantis but not horrible on its own.

    • urandom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s slightly more convenient than sailing, considering it’s attached to my unlimited photo backup

    • Windshear@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I originally started paying for prime for the free shipping. Prime video is a perk as far as I’m concerned. I haven’t re-evaluated it in a long time though to see if it’s worth it. I do order a ton of stuff on amazon since I live 160km from the nearest city.

  • Tosti@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    9 months ago

    The moment each show got a pre-reel for another Amazon show this was clearly the path they where taking.

    Already cancelled a good 6 months ago.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 months ago

    The only reason I ever had Prime was free shipping, then I realized as soon as I bundled my orders to be over a certain dollar figure I STILL got free shipping, I kicked Prime to the curb.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can even get a free week of prime for 2 dollars by just not giving-in which you can then immediately cancel and get ovre and over and over and over again.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    “We aim to have meaningfully fewer ads than linear TV and other streaming TV providers. No action is required from you, and there is no change to the current price of your Prime membership,”

    The double-speak is relatively subtle, but it’s always interesting to see how much work they put into gaslighting their customers:

    • “No action is required from you…” - yes, Amazon hopes we do nothing, but Amazon unilaterally changed the assumptions underlying agreement, so “no action” is an acquiescence to a materially worse reality for us and a better one for Amazon.
    • “…there is no change to the current price of your Prime membership” - yes, no additional dollars are required because Amazon is now selling our time and attention, but that is still a new “fee” we are paying.

    Pretty gross, Amazon.

    • ripcord@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is Prime Video something that people sign up for a d would cancel? I thought it was something they just happened to get when buying the express shipping package.

      • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Each part of Prime just keeps getting shittier and shittier, this could definitely be a straw that broke the camel’s back situation. Shipping stopped being 2-days every time during the pandemic, returns used to allow for pick up at your house are now drop off at a store. Music catalog is being slowly locked behind Unlimited, and now it’s all station-ified so you can’t even listen to what you want.

  • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Thankfully, much of Amazons content shows up on Usenet so I can just download the ad-free versions there and then watch it.

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I just got too many channels for like 16 bucks from China.

    They can fuck right off. That said they have a decent output so I’m not going to cancel them outright.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    So for those who don’t know, this happened with cable back in the day. No ads was part of the pitch, then they were slowly introduced, the appeal of the product fell, and, at least in my circles, fewer held on to the product over time.

    • Pepsi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      that’s patently untrue.

      the first cable stations were OTA (network) stations from major cities being served to rural areas. those had ads.
      the first cable-specific channel was TBS which was just a converted Atlanta NBC channel that also had ads.
      as basic cable grew, new channels launched with ads.

      Premium channels like HBO launched in the 70s without ads but afaik those channels are still ad-free except self-promotion between shows.

  • rynzcycle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Bummer. Not because of the extra $3, honestly I’ll probably just pay it. But because until now Prime programming has been able to operate with a certain freedom. I know 0 people with prime for the video (as opposed to the free delivery) so they were willing to take risks with the shows.

    Solos and Tales from the Loop are both amazing works of art that would never have shown up on network TV, or Netflix which would much rather make cheap mass appeal shows with little depth. Even more shows with wider appeal (e.g. The Expanse) might not survive the TV Executive mindset now that they have a reason to care about the number of views as a primary metric, over user happiness.

    And honestly, it all baffles me, I will gladly subscribe to a streaming service for one great show. Produce 3 or 4 a year and I’m subscribed for good. If I wanted an endless string of medicore baking reality shows, I’d get cable again.