For some women in China, “Barbie” is more than just a movie — it’s also a litmus test for their partner’s views on feminism and patriarchy.

The movie has prompted intense social media discussion online, media outlets Sixth Tone and the China Project reported this week, prompting women to discuss their own dating experiences.

One user on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu — a photo-sharing site similar to Instagram that’s mostly used by Gen Z women — even shared a guide on Monday for how women can test their boyfriends based on their reaction to the film.

According to the guide, if a man shows hatred for “Barbie” and slams female directors after they leave the theatre, then this man is “stingy” and a “toxic chauvinist,” according to Insider’s translation of the post. Conversely, if a man understands even half of the movie’s themes, “then he is likely a normal guy with normal values and stable emotions,” the user wrote.

  • Arotrios@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have to admit, Barbie becoming a Chinese feminist icon was not on my 2023 bingo card. Anyone taking bets on when we’re gonna get a kpop version of this classic?

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Barbie starting the revolution in China? Hopefully other countries as well. Good timeline.

      • Nix@merv.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No it’s not lol

        Their political leaders are billionaires, the workers don’t own any means of production, there’s terrible workers rights, etc.

        • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s how communism always ends up. When you hand over majority of the power to the state, it won’t be keen on giving it back.

          That’s like saying the US is not capitalist because we don’t have a true free market and better products/services don’t always rise to the top.

          These simply aren’t things that can practically happen, just like the workers owning the means of production.

          • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That doesn’t make any sense though. Communism isn’t when you “give power to the state.” It’s a word used to describe a specific economic system that China does not have. The word that best describes what I think you’re getting at is “authoritarian.” Words mean things, and if a thing doesn’t fit the definition of a word, then it isn’t that word.

              • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Homie, which states have ever actually implemented communism? Calling yourself “Communist” means about as much as North Korea calling themselves a" Democratic People’s Republic" if you don’t actually implement it’s ideas.

                Additionally, all attempts at democracy, and all instances of capitalism, have resulted in tyranny, because it’s just really hard to build a society that doesn’t do that no matter what governmental system and economic system you set out to establish.

                Even places like New Zealand or the Nordic countries which are much closer to a social democracy are tyrannical insofar as they participate, propagate, and benefit from a global network of capitalism that is only possible through the exploitation of hundreds millions, if not billions of people. Outsourcing your tyranny and exploitation to other places on the planet is still tyranny.and exploitation: it just has better PR.

                • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  which states have ever actually implemented communism?

                  Ah, no true communism. Communism certainly can’t end up authoritarian if there is no true communism. ;p

  • spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think if anyone gets mad at a Barbie movie or some random article on the internet that has nothing to do with them, that’s a good sign they’re emotionally unstable

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d call it emotionally immature.

      A surprising number of the people I grew up or work with act like they’re still in high school when it comes to social/interpersonal skills – these people are all well over 30 years old.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am only 42, but I work with a bunch of 60+ y/os. They never grow out of it from what I can tell. If they are like that in their 30s they’ll be like that till they die most of the time.

    • zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      People are free to be mad at anything as they please as long as they dont harm to other people.

      Or maybe people should not be mad at news article of Russia invading Ukraine for no reason?

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    74
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you base your relationship on a fucken Hollywood movie then that should be a litmus test in and of itself.

    Also, guys, if your girlfriend constantly feels the need to “test” your relationship, then she’s not the right one. Thats a massive red flag.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean there’s no harm in using a cultural moment as a starting point to see if two people are compatible?

      I think the language in the article and perhaps from the influencers is a bit rigid.

      I don’t think anyone is suggesting that if a man has valid reasons for disliking the movie they are automatically exist. The idea is that the film is causing a knee jerk reaction in men who are otherwise prone to hiding their misogyny.

      I didn’t get a lot of the inside jokes about the product. And the barbies and Ken’s did not unite to kill Will Ferrell.

      • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        The idea is that the film is causing a knee jerk reaction in men who are otherwise prone to hiding their misogyny.

        Why would a knee jerk reaction be any indication of misogyny? The movie is very antagonistic towards men. The proposition that having a negative reaction to that is misogyny is absurd.

        • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not, though. It’s antagonistic to the patriarchy, sure, just like it’s antagonistic to the matriarchy, but “man” and “patriarchy” are two entirely separate concepts.

          It’s like if a movie came out that criticized the for-profit medical insurance industry in the US and people started saying that it criticized all doctors

    • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wanting to test if your new boyfriend is a misogynist is hardly a red flag. The article doesn’t say anything about testing dudes constantly. It doesn’t even say he has to like the movie, just understand some of its themes.

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not basing the relationship off of the movie. It’s just a way to test if any red flags come up.

      • Sjatar@sjatar.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s healthy to observe your partners reaction to things. Especially when it comes to things that are quite important for a long term relationship, like their thoughts about gender roles. If you organically went to see the movie and your partner is clearly displaying red flags from it, then that’s just good (not the red flags but that you now know).

        I guess the trickery of going to assess them specifically can be seen as a asshole move. But I think it’s a good move compared to alternatives ^^

        • SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Being manipulative is a good alternative compared to just being direct and asking your partner what they think? I’m sure someone who is going to throw a fit about the Barbie movie will be happy to tell you what they think about feminism if you just ask.

          • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How many dudes on dating apps say they’re “not into politics” because they know admitting they’re conservative will diminish their dating pool?

            Women know better than to only listen to words. They’ve been trained to watch for actions as well.

          • Sjatar@sjatar.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t see it as more manipulative then to ask leading questions to assess anybodies stance on subjects ^^ Especially when it’s a way to shield yourself from real harm that might be caused by the party you are probing information from.

            • SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you’re worried about real harm this person should not be your partner. It doesn’t matter what they think about a movie.

        • Torvum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Movies are not a good basis on someone’s perception of anything. Their interactions with reality are.

          • WindInTrees@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Many movies are based on real-life or have pertinent real-life themes. They depict something “fake” in order to communicate a truth about real life.

    • EhList@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a fair test for straight couples though. If the guy is really misogynistic they are not the right guy.

      • johnlobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        if your boyfriend is a mysogonos you should do a selfcheck. If you keep attracting asshole then the problem is you.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seeing a movie with someone is part of your experience with them, through which you determine their personality and character, is it not?

      I agree that “testing” people is kind of toxic, but the idea that your assessment of a person isn’t cumulative and inclusive feels odd.

  • Psyduck_world@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I thought the movie criticizes both extreme feminism and male chauvinism, or did I watch a different Barbie movie?

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what the article is saying as well.

      Any gendered chauvinism sucks and patriarchy causes suffering to anyone.

      And if someone comes out of the movie angered by this knowledge, they can be a troublesome person to other people.

    • IceMan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is indeed what is in Barbie - if you watch it and actually think about the themes. If you’re just there for the experience then the message is (quote moviegoer behind my back discussing with friends): “goddamn, this is a step in right direction, we won’t change this patriarchal world with one film however“ :P

      On a basic level the message “Ken was silly, broke Barbieworld because he wanted to emulate men, they had to get Barbie and a feminist back to fix it” - and that’s what most people will get out of Barbie.

      • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        On a basic level the message “Ken was silly, broke Barbieworld because he wanted to emulate men, they had to get Barbie and a feminist back to fix it”

        How did he break it? He basically just flipped the genders so Kens are the ruling/working class and Barbies are just subservient eye candy. Barbie just flipped it back. It’s a broken and unimaginably unfair world in either case.

        When Kens ask just for a bit of equality at the end, they are shut down and given some unimportant appeasement as a joke.

        • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          When Kens ask just for a bit of equality at the end, they are shut down and given some unimportant appeasement as a joke.

          The movie is calling this out on purpose. It’s how women are currently treated in western society.

    • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Barbie Was not the good guy in the Barbie movie, right? Like, even in the end they admit that they will not give the Kens true equality, just enough that they basically won’t revolt again. People here calling Barbie a feminist icon, what movie were you watching?

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lmfao “extreme feminism”
      “tHeY wAnT eXtReMe eQuAlItY!1!1” smdfh

      [citation needed]

      (and no, men being generalised against as shits is not an act of extremism no matter how uncomfortable it made you feel lol get back to me when the levels of harm become even close to being comparable)

  • tenitchyfingers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Correct. Honestly, if a dude gets offended by a movie that says “hey dude, learn how to love and value yourself without basing all of your sense of self on your romantic relationship to a woman and you’ll be much happier”, they are NOT a catch at all and they need to shed some shit about their lives.

  • MossBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of note…American conservatives/confederates absolutely detest the Barbie movie.

      • MossBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that Chinese women being more progressive is a threat to the conservative Chinese government.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean, actual Marxist thought is explicitly feminist, at least under the definition that women are the intellectual and legal equals of men. The Soviets, for all their flaws, flipped one of the most rigid patriarchies in the world into one with… Well, some semblance of women’s liberation.

          And whatever other societal problems they have, or whether you can even call them Marxists, China isn’t attacking womens’ right to not die to a miscarriage.

          • MossBear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not overly familiar with that aspect of Marxism, but I can certainly believe it. I can’t imagine that a philosophy with hundreds if not thousands of aspects to it, would be completely without merit, even if the whole is flawed.

    • Rayspekt@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know I one should derive a scientific test out of it, but if a guy gets batshit crazy over the movie, then he might not have the best relation towards independent women.

    • archiotterpup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a gay man, I say yes. I get to watch the hetero world from the outside and yeah, Barbie nails it. Folks just don’t like the mirror.

    • sxt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I definitely think it would do a fantastic job of baiting out reactions and listening to what someone has to say about it after would probably clue you in on what stood out to them about it. Obviously none of these types of tests can be conclusive, but I’d say if someone came out of the theater super angry then that’s pretty telling of something at least. A good starting point for further discussion with that person.

      On the whole I thought the movie was hilarious and had a very compassionate message for men at the end of the movie as well.

      My biggest issue after watching it had just been having to see braindead takes from people online, swinging in both directions. Lots of “the movie hates men” types but I’ve also seen a few “DAE, men bad?” tier takes as well which is a bit disheartening.

    • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know if it’s defininitive, but I do think it offers good insight into what a person notices when they watch things. There’s a whole lot to notice and think about in the movie

    • Amilo159@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a movie for me, so if I was forced or coerced into seeing it, I would probably hate it too. Then again, I haven’t seen it so don’t really know for sure.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t say you have to like the movie, just understand its themes.

        • Amilo159@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s actually a very good point that I didn’t even realise. I did say “hate it” but didn’t mean hating the movie, simply disliking and not enjoying the time.

          I guess it’s become far too easy to use extreme words in our daily speech nowadays, for which I blame social media.

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I second your opinion and I’m a woman. I just never liked the franchise, no matter how good the movie is, I don’t think I’d enjoy watching it either.

        • Hera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You might not like it, but I have huge barbie issues and went with my 11 yo thinking it would be okay and poke a but of fun and have a slightly feminist bent. I truly loved every minute and am surprised how much I did. It is formulaic but done really well.

        • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s rare, but this franchise owner understands very well that a lot of people hate Barbie. It’s even in the trailer “If you love Barbie, this movie is for you. If you hate Barbie, this movie is for you.”

      • expr@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tend to prefer similar movies as you and I loved the movie. It is a VERY fantastical, intelligent, existential, and heady movie. It’s one of the most expert navigations of complex social dynamics I’ve ever seen and has an absolute shitload of cinema references and easter eggs to boot.

        Don’t let the surface fool you. The franchise is just a vehicle for Greta’s ideas to reach a mass audience.

        • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The franchise is a vehicle to sell barbies.

          Mattel decided this was the best way in the current cultural mood.

          • good_girl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Vehicles tend to have space for many things. Writers also tend to not be massive corporations even while speaking for said corporations.

          • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s like saying The Lego Movie and the Lego Batman movie were a vehicle to sell Legos. That’s pretty obviously not all they were, and just because they could sell toys that doesn’t mean they weren’t also good movies.

        • Amilo159@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh so having a taste means being toxic or fragile now?

          Clearly it’s Your toxic insecurity that can’t handle others have different taste than you. You’re just insecure fragile female in that regards.

          • avater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            having a taste does not mean to show hatred. You can simply dislike something and you’re done.

            But if you show hatred to a movie, a show, a book and the people who worked on that (actors, directors…) I think you have some issues. And that’s what this article is about right?

    • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. The movie is very antagonistic towards men. I don’t think anyone who has seen the movie can dispute that in good faith.

      Practically every male character in both the Barbie world and the real world is portrayed negatively. There are a few exceptions that are portrayed neutrally but they are mostly plot or exposition devices.

      Conversely, practically every female character is portrayed positively. This creates a stark contrast that’s very difficult to ignore.

      To be clear - personally I don’t care, it takes more to rile me up. But hating a movie that is deliberately spiteful towards your demographic is not an abnormal reaction. Neither is “slamming” the people who made it.

      • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man here. I disagree.

        The movie is only “antagonistic towards men” if you think the Kens are somehow supposed to be a 1:1 realistic depiction of real life men which is something not only not textually supported but also actively and explicitly contradicted by the film

        The kens aren’t stupid because they’re men, they’re stupid because they’re Ken Dolls. Both Kens and Barbies are highly hyperbolic depictions of how little girls play with Barbies and Kens.

        Personally, I found the movie to be very empowering as a man too. I’d recommended rewatching it and trying to think critically about what the movie is doing. It’s a film, not an after school special where every character is supposed to be a direct black-and-white representation of “thing good” or “thing bad”

      • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s antagonistic towards the patriarchy. You completely misunderstood the Ken plot and are the one arguing in bad faith.

        In fact, your response is exactly why some people view the movie as a good way to see what an individual pays attention to and whether or not they genuinely understand what the film is critiquing and why.

        You failed.

  • •••@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s interesting. I read that the film was about radical feminism, but gender switched with Ken as the feminist to overthrow the Barbie-dominating system. Really look forward to seeing the movie.

    • hawkguy@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that analogy doesn’t work a 100 %. But I guess you could say that the film explores something like that.

      But go ahead and watch the film. I enjoyed it very much.

    • ANALHACKER_3000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought the movie was exceedingly clever and is a shining example of how sometimes a message is more about what it doesn’t say that what it does.

      That being said, the movie is definitely a rorschach test and you will see what you are primed to believe reflected in it.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is that the film undercuts most of its social commentary and ends up a wash, so watch it for the absurd interpretation of barbie life.

    • zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      By partaking means paying tickets and trying to make the film the best selling movie.

      Guess it ain’t happening, so far.

  • Phoebe@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    My boyfriend and i can’t wait to watch this movie 😊 💕 (but cinema got expensiv dudeee 🥲)

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only reason I have any interest in it is all the conservative jimmy-rustling it’s doing.

      • socsa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. I tried to buy bud light but it’s legitimately awful. Seeing barbie twice is a way better option.

    • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I was the same way going into it, and after watching it my thoughts were “I don’t regret watching it, but I wouldn’t have regretted missing out either.”

      The movie is great, and there were multiple moments where I burst out laughing. It’s also a really bizarre acid trip, and I mean that in a good way! But at the end of the day, it’s a hot pink version of The Lego Movie, down to Will Farrell playing a (less evil and more well-meaning) Lord Business. It’s a movie made by women, for women, about a series of toys designed for women. That’s not a bad thing by any means, and it’s not like men cannot enjoy it, but it also means it may not interest you, and that’s fine too.

      • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it really as critical of capital as The Lego Movie was? I haven’t seen it yet, though I intend to.

        Fox Business, among other right-wing news outlets, were foaming at the mouth about how The Lego Movie was anti-capitalist. Search up “Lego movie anti capitalist” on your preferred search engine to see what I mean.

        • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mmmmm, I don’t think I’d go that far, no. Feminist? Very much so. Unable to decide if the Mattel executives are actually antagonistic because Mattel didn’t want to make themselves look too bad? Probably.

    • Ado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course. I don’t care for Barbie either, and never played with the toys during childhood so there’s no connection for me. I went to watch with my fiance because it was something she was interested in. The movie was okay. Wasn’t great, wasn’t horrible. I think when it becomes telling is when people are somehow offended or pretend like it’s the worst movie created.

    • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same, I just can’t bring myself to care about a movie that’s about toys I have zero nostalgia for.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “If you love barbie you’ll love the movie!”

      “If you hate barbie you’ll love the movie!”

      Idgaf about barbie so I didn’t bother watching.

    • DrM@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why wouldnt it? It’s also cool if you dislike the movie, it’s not cool if you dislike female directors “because of this movie”

    • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My interest in upbeat movies has never been very high. If it were a thriller or mystery that’d be cool. I’d watch. It’s ok we can pass on this one.

    • guangming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t get why you’d think it would be censored? If anything the movie skewers US capitalism, so the CCP would probably be happy for folks to see it.

    • panCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since a while hollywood has been making movies keeping china and its censorship in mind !

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is in my very unbiased opinion that is totally not a promotion (as that would be against strike rules) that everybody should see this movie.

    Multiple times.