A 56-year-old Snohomish man had set his Tesla Model S on Autopilot and was looking at his cellphone on Friday when he struck and killed a motorcyclist in front of him in Monroe, court records show.

A Washington State Patrol trooper arrested the Tesla driver at the crash site on Highway 522 at Fales Road shortly before 4 p.m. on suspicion of vehicular manslaughter, according to a probable cause affidavit.

The motorcyclist, Jeffrey Nissen, 28, of Stanwood, died at the scene, records show.

The Tesla driver told a state trooper he was driving home from having lunch in Bothell and was looking at his phone when he heard a bang and felt his car lurch forward, accelerate and hit the motorcyclist, according to the affidavit.

The man told the trooper his Tesla got stuck on top of the motorcyclist and couldn’t be moved in time to save him, the affidavit states.

The trooper cited the driver’s “inattention to driving, while on autopilot mode, and the distraction of the cell phone while moving forward,” and trusting “the machine to drive for him” as probable cause for a charge of vehicular manslaughter, according to the affidavit.

The man was booked into the Snohomish County Jail and was released Sunday after posting bond on his $100,000 bail, jail records show.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    this guy should get everything coming to him. FSD/autopilot is not good enough to take your hands off the wheel and not pay attention to the fuck’s going on around you.

    that said. Tesla absolutely should get a massive wrongful death lawsuit and get fucked by the courts.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Everyone from the driver to whoever certified the car as road worthy to Elon Musk should be held responsible. In reality I would be surprised if anyone except the driver will even see the inside of the court.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        7 months ago

        yup. every one else has very expensive lawyers.

        reality is Teslas are a shit product with false advertising.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m honestly not sure which is worse, that Tesla made a system they call Autopilot that isn’t an autopilot or that Tesla owners still think it is.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        naw. I think the worst part is when, in tests because that’s the only places they can turn it on in most states, it’ll slow down for an object in the road, and then decide to floor it.

        • nxdefiant@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You can turn it on anywhere in the U.S. I’m not sure if it’s geolocked elsewhere. You might be confusing it with GM, Ford, Mercedes, and other systems which only work on certain stretches of certain roads.

    • machinin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      FSD/autopilot is not good enough to take your hands off the wheel and not pay attention to the fuck’s going on around you.

      What? There’s a video on Tesla’s website right now that says the driver is at the wheel only for legal reasons. There is no other purpose to have a driver.

      I’m stumped!

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah. how many times did they say ‘Cybertruck is coming out this year’, only for it to not? I suspect they got it into production by mashing parts together because of consumer protection things coming into effect. they’re full of shit. and the “legal reasons” are so as to make the driver responsible and not them.

    • MakePorkGreatAgain@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      and you’re not even supposed to have a cellphone in use while driving in WA, that’s an automatic ticket… though the police have you catch you doing it first.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    a bunch of years ago, I was driving south on Aurora (in Seattle) and right after the bridge I witnessed a older smaller import drive up on a motorcyclist. I got out and helped tip the car over so we could pull the lady on the motorcycle out. The whole time the dude in the car was just being a fucking idiot. Wouldn’t help us at all. Wouldn’t open the doors or anything. So once we had enough people we just fucking tipped that car on its fucking side and waited for the cops.

    That would have been impossible with the amount of low center of gravity weight the Tesla’s have.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah he opened the door and climbed out once the cop arrived. I think he was afraid we’d linch him or something. Someone took his keys at one point. I remember screaming at him through the window to get out of the car and help us. But he just dead stares forward the whole time

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    What’s the actual point of “autopilot” if you have to pay full attention and be ready to take control at a moments notice?

    Sounds like… driving. 🤔

    • Shrank7242@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s poorly named. A more accurate, less marketing influenced name would be “Adaptive Cruise Control with Lane Assist” for the basic “Autopilot”.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Modern cruise control makes it much less taxing to drive. You can focus only the necessities while leaving things like lane centering and maintaining a proper distance up to the ecu.

      Tesla fsd is really just advanced cruise control. The problem is you can’t program out the idiots, and Tesla’s fsd should be considered advanced cruise control and not imply that the operator doesn’t need to pay attention.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 months ago

        But if it’s marketed to change lanes, adjust speed, avoid obstacles, stop, signal, and everything else a driver does… then it’s being marketed as far more than “advanced cruise control”, is it not?

        Quite literally their website says: “Tesla cars come standard with advanced hardware capable of providing Autopilot features, and full self-driving capabilities.”

        “The system is designed to be able to conduct short and long distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver’s seat.

        “When you arrive at your destination, simply step out at the entrance and your car will enter park seek mode, automatically search for a spot and park itself. A tap on your phone summons it back to you.

        They are telling you the car will drive without someone even being in it!

        Why are they even allowed to get away with this kind of marketing? Getting people killed along the way.

        • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I agree that’s is marketed as fully autonomous and it shouldn’t be. I think the states dmv should have stepped in and not allowed a vehicle to be registered as anything but having cruise control unless they OK’d it because there are idiots behind the wheel that are simply ignorant of the fact that they are moving multiple tons of mass at speeds that are faster than they can react.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Fsd? You mean the service tesla itself named “Full self driving?”

        Sure seems like the company is very intentionally misleading its customers, no matter how many disclaimers they have added over the years as more and more people get killed by their cars.

        Your point will have more merit when Tesla drops that dangerously misleading name. Until then, they are partially culpable.

    • brlemworld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s named after airplanes, airplane autopilot doesn’t do everything and you need to be ready to take control at a moments notice.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      What’s the point of cruise control if you still have to pay attention? What’s the point of adding adaptive cruise control and lane assist if you still have to pay attention?

      They’re all things that help alleviate some of the monotonous things one has to do while driving. Self driving also had the benefit of, in the future, completely relieving human drivers.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        In fairness, cruise control is designed for maintaining a speed when you are just going straight for a long time, in a situation where other vehicles are going the same speed (i.e. on a highway). Cruise control isn’t designed to navigate around pedestrians, turn lanes, approach intersections, or do anything else that would put people in danger.

        Of course, you still have to know when to stop, but that would be during situations where cruise control would NOT be appropriate.

        Tesla wants people to use these features in cities, where you’ve got kids and people walking around. Totally different, and I think they should be held accountable for how they’ve marketed these features.

        Self driving also had the benefit of, in the future, completely relieving human drivers.

        Yes, and no. The infrastructure would need to be designed for self-driving vehicles, or you get too many unpredictable variables that aren’t properly accounted for. As they are today, they shouldn’t be allowed on public roadways.

        We had an autonomous bus one municipality over that ran off the road and hit a tree and critically injured the operator. God forbid this happened near a school. A human driver wouldn’t have done that unless they were impaired.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You claimed there was no point if you have to pay attention. I was responding to that and pointing out there are all kinds of things that currently assist in driving that still require paying attention. Self driving just replaced more of that, just as adaptive cruise control replaced more of that than cc itself.

          Liability is a whole different question. although, I have to laugh the idea of humans not making mistakes

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            We’re talking about features that are intended to two very different purposes.

            Cruise control is designed so that a driver doesn’t have to keep their foot pressed on a gas pedal for hours on end (causing physical discomfort or injury) if they are going a constant speed. You are still required to drive, so cruise control was never an alternative to driving.

            But these marketed self-driving features are made to replace the act of driving, while still expecting that the person in the vehicle has their full attention and control over it when the car decides to break bad.

            There’s a massive different, IMO.

            Seems like “assisted-driving” might be a better term, even if it results in fewer sales. 😂

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Again, “You claimed there was no point if you have to pay attention. I was responding to that and pointing out there are all kinds of things that currently assist in driving that still require paying attention.”

              I agree with you that it should not be marketed as SD and that there is a massive difference between the two. But in the way I compared them, in response to the argument you made, those differences make no difference.

  • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ah. Glad to know I can put a damper on my excitement for motorcycle riding season to be back…

    Granted, this is possible with any car in any state. Just need to make sure I’m explicitly on the lookout for teslas driving behind me.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Be careful out there! I work in orthopedics and rehabilitation at my state’s only trauma 1 ward, and motorcycle MVA have always taken up spaces in the icu. However, since COVID there has definitely been an increase.

      When I first started practicing the majority of bikers were in the icu because of their own behavior, whether that be unsafe driving or lack of protective gear. Now it seems everyone is getting mowed over at intersections by SUVs.

      I think it’s a combination of more distractions for drivers, mixed with the ever growing size of American vehicles. We’re seeing the same with pedestrian injuries as well, vehicles are just too massive nowadays.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Granted, this is possible with any car in any state.

      But it’s more likely in a car where the drivers may have been mislead into believing a myth that the car will drive itself safely without them.

      If someone’s driving a Ford, they’d have to be certifiably insane to believe it’s ever safe to take your eyes off the road and hands off the wheel for long periods of time and expect to not have an accident. Insane to the degree they’d have never gotten their license.

      If they’re in a Tesla, they just need to be a stupid consumer to believe that.

      • Shrank7242@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        But it’s more likely in a car where the drivers may have been mislead into believing a myth that the car will drive itself safely without them.

        I’d wager the driver knew full well that the car does not drive without them. While it is a very poorly and marketing influenced name (“Autopilot”); unless this was the drivers first time using it, and had only used it for 5 seconds before the accident they new perfectly well what the feature was.

        You have to try to game the car for it to allow you to take your hands off the wheel. It’s pretty sensitive to movements and if your hands are off the wheel you get visible and audible alerts before the car disengages the cruise control / lane assistance.

        This seems like a case of a reckless driver who killed someone and is attempting to push blame or form some excuse for their negligence. The driver not paying attention to the road is the danger here, no matter what car they’re driving.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      When I got my first motorcycle I was in love … until I had to ride on city streets with assholes. Got to the point I was happier hopping on the back of someone else’s bike so I could just enjoy the ride.

      Highways were, and still are, the best rides tho.

    • malloc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tesla drivers are quickly taking #1 spot for worst human AND “ai” drivers

  • malloc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    No wonder Tesla reduced the cost of this program. It’s absolute shite.

    It’s the equivalent of Cruise at this point. Get this shite vehicle off the road already