The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a conservative-led attack that could have undermined the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The justices ruled 7-2 that the way the agency is funded does not violate the Constitution, reversing a lower court. The CFPB was created after the 2008 financial crisis to regulate mortgages, car loans and other consumer finance.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly shocked Clarence Thomas thought other people needed financial protection. Or cared about other people at all.

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even a broken clock is right twice a day…

        With Clarence Thomas it’s once every few decades.

      • evatronic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        He doesn’t.

        This is just his hall pass vote to make him appear less of an ideologue for later, when he proceeds to fuck the country over for Trump.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    Holy fuck, I absolutely did not expect this outcome at all. The CFPB is so necessary, so I assumed the court was going to throw it out. This makes me more optimistic about Chevron.

  • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wow! A rare decision in favor of the consumer! In general, it probably should have some sort of oversight elsewhere, but that should probably wait until we make it illegal to have the bribery that goes on every day in Congress.

    If the R’s take back the White House, this will probably be on the chopping block.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Considering this unexpected win plus a few times when I expected the liberal justices to dissent but they didn’t, I’m starting to wonder if there’s some deal-making going on behind the scenes.

  • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This announcement is entirely part of a plan trying to build up good will before ruling Trump immune from everything.