The Human Rights Campaign is launching a spending push in six key states to rally “equality voters” — and warns that many still need to be persuaded to vote for Biden.

And after crunching the numbers, the organization sees warning signs in the form of soft support for Biden in the 2024 electorate.

HRC estimates that this year there will be 75 million “equality voters” — who vote based on support for LGBTQ rights — up from 62 million in 2020 and 52 million in 2016. But the group says one-third of them aren’t a lock for Biden. In the six key swing states, hundreds of thousands are “at risk of not voting,” and another group of hundreds of thousands of voters are what HRC refers to as “double doubters” who will likely defect to a third party, according to data HRC shared with NBC News.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.cafeEnglish
    02·
    1 month ago

    How arrogant would voters have to be to vote in favor their rights while Biden is helping murder and violating human rights of brown people around the world?

    Campaigning on women’s rights while denying women’s rights to life around the world.

    • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
      0·
      1 month ago

      Because I would like to still be alive and not a second class citizen so that I can do what I can to advocate for those who still need that recognition and aid rather than backslide and have everything be universally worse. Can’t rightly do that when I’m getting sent to the fucking camps too.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.cafeEnglish
        03·
        1 month ago

        You are already a second class citizen to the US government. In this country you either have money or you dont. Anyone without it is treated as a second class citizen, and has no representation in government.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      0·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I’m sure Trump will be your man and the defender of the rights of brown people and women…lol

    • BReel@lemmy.one
      0·
      1 month ago

      I don’t like it, but in reality I have 2 choices.

      1. Someone who is supporting awful things around the world, but will (at least temporarily) protect myself and my community. or
      2. Someone who will continue supporting awful things around the world, and will without a doubt persecute and hunt me and my community.

      It’s a shit choice. But its an easy choice. One candidate is a very real threat to not just myself, but my friends, family, and community. The other is not.

      I’d love our magic 3rd option to show up and be viable, but they won’t. We all know this.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.cafeEnglish
        04·
        1 month ago

        Democrats havent done a damn thing to protect our community, endless lip service about rights and protections while doing nothing causes more harm

        • BReel@lemmy.one
          1·
          1 month ago

          So the people doing nothing are causing more harm than the people actively hunting and persecuting me?

          I’d disagree. That’s like saying my neighbors who didn’t put out the fire in my house are just as bad as my other neighbor who started the fire in the first place.

          We have two choices.

          Democrats haven’t done a damn thing…

          • anticolonialist@lemmy.cafeEnglish
            11·
            1 month ago

            Except in your bad up scenario, neighbor 1 provided the matches to neighbor 2.

            YOU have 2 choices, neither of them is on list list. Theres a larger chance of you voting republican than me voting for either

            • BReel@lemmy.one
              0·
              1 month ago

              Dems did not supply the matches lol. Republicans showed up with a flame thrower.

              But whatever. There will be no winning you over, even with facts provided. Later boo