• njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s kind of silly to think that all political ideologies can be defined on one line isn’t it?

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Which is a different thing than a spectrum, right? Putting your little data points on a line, assigning number values to seizing the means and chattel slavery?

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m sorry. If conceptualizing political ideologies bores you, then why did you reply to my comment about exactly that?

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because I was challenging your assumption that it is something you can or should do to derive a meaningful understanding of political beliefs and how they interact with each other, or for that matter, concepts of ethics and morality.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Beliefs and ideology are very different. I was talking about the defining characteristics of established ideologies. Adding personal beliefs only further increases the need for a more robust graph than a line.

            I don’t make assumptions about an individual’s beliefs based on their political alignment. I know too many single-issue voters to make that mistake.

            My assertion about progressives supporting censorship of speech applies to the ideology, not each and every individual that supports the ideology. Many don’t recognize that as authoritarian, because of its good intentions.