• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t know what they want. I just think their current statements are not necessarily in conflict with the peace deal they proposed.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hypothetically, let’s say that he is secretly game for the cease fire. How does he pivot from implying that the conditions are not met as things stand today to suddenly adopting a stance that is consistent with your proposed interpretation?

      If what you said was true, that he is willing to consider the threat eliminated, then he would have said it already. Since he implies otherwise means he is requiring something more than the current situation. There’s no path to just abandon his stated position without something actually changing.