• BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “People in the lgbtq+ community aren’t real trek fans” is absolutely not what he said.

      he agreed with it, which is tantamount to saying it himself.

      He shouldn’t have agreed with this asshole who tweeted at him, but that is what he did wrong.

      yet, you’re here defending him? so, you think it’s ok to agree with bigotry as long as you don’t say it out loud? wow

      But this is just not good enough for the woman who quote tweeted him and just had to add her own little flair to the truth to make it sound worse.

      Beltran says agrees with a homophobic/transphobic tweet, and your problem is that someone objected? So, to you, the bigotry isn’t the problem, but the fact that anyone has a problem with bigotry and speaks out against it? Because that’s what it sounds like.

    • sshff@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Additional context:

      He has also gone on to block a large number of LGBTQ fans tweeting to simply ask if he meant what was implied or not. The situation ain’t good.

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He has also gone on to block a large number of LGBTQ fans tweeting to simply ask if he meant what was implied or not. The situation ain’t good.

        Yeah that is not good! And I’m glad people asked.

        To others, on the off chance this actually appears. Apologies if my meaning was not clear. I think that the person Beltran responded to is homophobic and disgusting. I also thought that the person quote tweeting him put words in his mouth. Both of these things are bad.

        Clearly with the additional context from this comment Beltran is also an asshole. All of the others seemed to think that me expressing both opinions above means I was “defending” Beltran, which is not the case. It was also possible to interpret what he said as trying to avoid the question. I assume that’s why people asked him to clarify.

        • sshff@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s ok. Being fair, open minded, and happy to hear new info is the best way to go about these things. This is the first time a bunch of people are hearing about Beltran being a bit of a bigoted arsehole but he’s been like this for years (didn’t used to be this bad, at least overtly, but has gotten more so with age). Those who have been in the convention scene for a fair time are in no way shocked.

    • OkToBeTakei@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But this is just not good enough for the woman who quote tweeted him and just had to add her own little flair to the truth to make it sound worse.

      worse than agreeing that LGBTQ+ people aren’t real Trek fans? how, exactly? please explain, because when you are with someone who thinks things like that, it’s as bad as saying it yourself, especially when you do it publicly. I can’t think of why anyone would come here of all places to defend that.