• Kalash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it would be better if everyone climbing a mountain does so out of their own free will and because they want to, and not out of financial necessity.

    But that is something for the local governments to fix and not the responsibility of mountaineers.

    • grahamsz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But most mountaineers get by without having to hire people to carry their shit for them. Certainly people here in Colorado use guides from time to time, but i’ve never heard of anyone using a porter. Maybe i’m ignorant, but it seems like mountaineers only use porters in the himalayas because they are cheap and disposable.

      Perhaps if you can’t summit a mountain without another human to carry your equipment then it should be ok to not summit that mountain.

      • Kalash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we’re talking about high altitude peaks, like the 14 peaks, most people that summit do it “expediation style”, which always includes sherpas and porters. Only very few people have accomplished climbing one of the 14 peaks “alpine style”.

        • grahamsz@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for the terminology - that makes it easier!

          Only very few people have accomplished climbing one of the 14 peaks “alpine style”.

          I’m quite ok with that.

          If the rockies were 28k instead of 14k then I still don’t think there’d be a situation where we hire poor villagers from the outskirts of Denver to put their lives on the line. I really believe the high peaks are summited expedition-style because the poverty makes that practical, which in turn allows many more people to reach the top