• TheMage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well - who decides how wealth is “distributed”? How much does the person that generated the wealth get to keep? Who decides what gets spent on what? I agree with you in principle here and I am sick of anti-capitalists whiners. But, when I hear “distribute”…I get nervous because who is in charge of that? Like politicians? eeeeewwww.

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re perfectly fitting the stereotype of the ‘temporarily embarrassed billionaire’.

    • flossdaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. The people decide. Through there elective representatives.

      2. This whole post is about an awareness that the “person” generating the wealth is actually hundreds of thousands of people generating the wealth.

      Bill Gates didn’t generate 80 billion dollars. He just positioned himself in manner to that allowed him to hoard 80 billion dollars in wealth generated by countless software engineers and other workers.

      1. I don’t understand being squeamish about ANYONE trying to redistribute wealth. Right now there’s like 3 people who have as much wealth as the bottom HALF of Americans (~150,000,000 people). The situation is beyond ridiculous.
      • TheMage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So - the elected representatives means the “usual” politicians? See, the problem is that means we are right where we are now with zillions of dollars being pissed away on “stuff” that a lot of us disagree with. I dont disagree that wealth is too accumulated up top, but I disagree that someone like gets to decide. And, if they are elected, that means those that fund their campaigns get more “say” than anyone else does.

        So, instead of taxes and wealth confiscation, we encourage businesses to pay more through tax relief that has to go directly to payroll? Maybe make it so a certain % of profits must be used for raises and bonuses? Stuff like that sounds better to me than some Washington boob deciding that money Ive earned out to be spent on xxxxx pet project.

          • TheMage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Love to get money out of politics but politics sort of is money. It will always be driven by money. Sucks.

            • Stinkywinks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It doesn’t have to be. We can have fair elections where every candidate gets the same exposure via a public fund specifically for elections. Outlaw lobbying and pacs and have every candidate just debate/speak on stream