Dire financial straits are leading droves of Olympic athletes to sell images of their bodies to subscribers on OnlyFans — known for sexually explicit content — to sustain their dreams of gold at the Games. As they struggle to make ends meet, a spotlight is being cast on an Olympics funding system that watchdog groups condemn as “broken,” claiming most athletes “can barely pay their rent.”

The Olympics, the world’s biggest sporting stage, bring in billions of dollars in TV rights, ticket sales and sponsorship, but most athletes must fend for themselves financially.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) did not express concern about the situation. When asked by The Associated Press about athletes turning to OnlyFans, IOC spokesman Mark Adams said, “I would assume that athletes, like all citizens, are allowed to do what they can.”

Watching his sponsorships dry up and facing mounting costs, Jack Laugher was among the pantheon of Olympic athletes using the often-controversial platform to get to the Games — or simply survive.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    i feel like these athletes need to have a plan B for real jobs.

    the olympics have been bastardized into a corporate for-profit orgy. theres no honor in these games. its sad that these humans who feel they are accomplishing something dont see the truth; theyre just tools that can be discarded.

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      its sad that these humans who feel they are accomplishing something dont see the truth; theyre just tools that can be discarded.

      They are accomplishing something. It’s just not recognized by the greedy fuckwits exploiting their achievements for profit.

    • cynthorpe@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Well, the plan is to get corporate sponsors. That’s always been the road.

      Edit: always as in the past ~50 years.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        really? which corps sponsored the roman olympics?

        or is this a recent requirement because humans dont actually put money into humanities without some profit incentive?

            • cynthorpe@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              The comment was never not okay. It’s a comment. Don’t be mad that I thought to be more specific about my comment before you got a chance to take your bad day out on a random person. I suggest taking your crappy attitude somewhere else. I assure you, no satisfaction will be gained by talking to me.

              • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                3 months ago

                i was expecting a discussion on the poisoning of the olympics by corporate entities, but all you did was point out it is ‘new’ as if that matters somehow

                I assure you, no satisfaction will be gained by talking to me.

                too late, but i get it; youre done. no prob

                • cynthorpe@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  If that’s what you wanted, you should have been more specific instead of assuming a jab would have been the proper way to have a polite conversation. I’m glad to know you can get satisfaction out of playing with yourself online. ✌️

        • Kaboom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          In the Roman Olympics, only rich people could compete. Now it’s better, not perfect, but better.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m wondering about viewership this year. Nobody I know is watching or talking about the games. Besides what hits social media like the Turkish shooter.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        A lot of people I know are watching, and more than just the memes.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s extremely popular. Every single business I’ve walked into has had it on the TV and all of my friend/family group chats and coworkers have been talking about it. It wouldn’t be making hundreds of millions in ad revenue if nobody was watching it.

    • kamenoko@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You can’t win if you have a plan B. Especially in prestige events. Either the athlete is fully supported by their countries association or they hope to get top 30.