• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    ·
    6 days ago

    The sheriff’s office said the woman, who was not at the home, had called deputies before the shooting to report two trespassers on her property. She also called Metz, who drove over to the home and allegedly blocked the teen’s car from leaving, KUSA reported.

    Metz then got out of his vehicle and is alleged to have fired one round through the windshield of the teen’s car, the station reported.

    These fuckeits refuse to ever just let a situation de-escalate on its own

    Like, you drive there to make them leave, prevent them from leaving. And shoot at the fucking driver before speaking to them.

    We can’t ignore the real life consequences of all this fucking fear mongering.

    • Nommer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      They don’t want to deescalate. They already had a big celebration planned in their head for murdering someone before they even do the act. They want to kill people so they can look like some hero. These people are sick and as far as I’m concerned their punishment should equal their crime.

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        6 days ago

        “Yay, I get to legally murder someone today! This’ll shut up my hippy liberal relatives” -Metz, shortly before pulling up to the teen’s car

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      6 days ago

      These shitlarpers are a bunch of weak babies that don’t have any idea how to be the big man they think they are.

    • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      According to an arrest affidavit obtained by the station, one of the teens reported hearing Metz say “Oh s—, my gun just went off” after the shooting.

      The kids did trespass by hopping a fence, I’m guessing his defense is going to be he was just trying to hold them there for police but accidentally discharged his weapon into a kids face. The fuckwit is really lucky the kid lived.

      I can’t understand the idiotic appeal of inserting yourself into these situations when the police are already on the way and there’s no danger to yourself to just waiting and letting them handle it.

    • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Current report is the gun accidentally went off. Dude deserves the books thrown at him though. Kids where already off his property and honestly where not a threat in the first place. This is like that one story where the dude shot at a car turning around in his driveway.

      As someone who owns multiple guns both for sport and hunting these are the people that should not ever own one!!!

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “oh shit my gun just went off”

    fucking hilarious how effortless it is for them to alternate between “guns don’t kill people” and “oh shit it wasn’t me–the gun did it!!!”

    but seriously-- if you live anywhere near bumfuck tumptown hickville, for fucks sake tell your kids not to go up on anyone’s property. i live in one of these areas, and the government couldn’t hire anyone to go door to door doing census count for that one reason. they. will. fucking. kill you

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Jumping right out of the truck immediately laying down covering fire regardless of the situation?

    Yep. That’s a republican.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    It wasn’t even his house; it was his girlfriend’s. She thought they were trespassers, she called him for help (she also called the sheriff) and he showed up pointing a gun.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 days ago

      They also were in their car outside the gate to the property. TECHNICALLY that gate may be inside the property line, but that’s still totally egregious.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      Is it? I heard the opposite. A lot of people live through suicide maimed because the bullet ricocheted off their skull. Supposedly, there are better ways to off yourself that I won’t specify here

  • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    This is why stand your ground laws can’t realistically exist in places that aren’t sparsely populated. Because someone will read “defend your property and life with force if necessary” as “act as a raging lunatic and attempt to shoot anyone who comes at the door because it’s legal to do so if you claim you were defending your property, even though there was no indication of actual imminent danger to property or people”.

    In my country we don’t have stand your ground laws. You can only defend yourself in case of an attack, but not drive away a thief. You’re supposed to run and call the police, but I keep wondering if a legal framework like the US where you weren’t legally punished for attacking a thief in your house wouldn’t be fairer but then there’s news like this.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      This has absolutely nothing to do with “Stand Your Ground”. SYG only applies when you or someone else are in real and imminent danger of serious bodily harm or death, neither of which were true in this case. That’s why the guy was arrested and has been charged with a number of serious offenses. He’s going to end up in prison.

      Since you aren’t from the United States I should also tell you that SYG isn’t a National thing, its only legal in the States in that have passed laws allowing it.

      I keep wondering if a legal framework like the US where you weren’t legally punished by attacking a thief in your house wouldn’t be fairer but then there’s news like this.

      That’s called “Castle Doctrine” and like SYG it isn’t National. It only exists in the States that have passed a law to allow it.

      It CAN work but there’s at least a few States that have Castle Doctrine and a Duty to Retreat so you end up having to flee a home invader until or unless you have no other choice.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      You are acting as if it were actually complicated. Requiring no duty to retreat makes perfect sense in your own home. The law most sane places says you have to be in a situation where a reasonable person would be in fear for life or bodily injury.

      Note “reasonable person” is a common legal standard. A reasonable person doesn’t think someone outside is automatically a threat. People who shiit then ask questions go to jail.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    I was going to say that “stand your ground” laws shouldn’t exist when so many people are terrified of shadows.

    But that’s it isn’t it? If they’re terrified of shadows then a gun and a power fantasy is the answer.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    If I can’t Shoot a Teenager in the Face you’re INFRINGING ON MY SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS! Now let me Save The Children!