The threats, which already closed government offices and caused school evacuations, come as Trump pushes racist lie

  • sudoshakes@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Current model from Silver and the polls raw data averages say it’s not even close. Trump will win the state by a 97.6% to 2.4% spread.

    Because so many of you cannot understand modeling vs polling averages… that is the likelihood of a win as a result of taking poll inputs through Silver’s model, reflecting overall chances of a win as a output.

    It is NOT polling average percentages.

    • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      In the latest version I found of Nate Silver’s model (not 538), he has Ohio coming in at 52.4% for Trump and 43.6% for Harris, an 8.8% spread. I did not dig deeper to find the dates or particular polls from Ohio he’s basing that on.

      However, based on these numbers, he is likely modelling that Trump wins Ohio in 90%+ of outcomes to Harris’s <5% of outcomes.

      This is the same way he spoke to his model in previous elections. It wasn’t that Hillary was expected to win 80-90% of the popular vote or electoral college just weeks before the 2016 election, it was that his model had her winning that percentage of the outcomes when he ran the model.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        If it starts to make his numbers dip it could trigger them to divert more money to Ohio it hadn’t previously meant to. Could have a broader effect.