The United Nations human rights chief says weaponizing ordinary communication devices represents a new development in warfare.
  • crashfrog@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    0·
    14 days ago

    They are asking for the source of your statement that less then 0.1% of the victims where valid targets

    Hezbollah is the source. That’s three times I’ve said so. What about that is still unclear?

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      0·
      14 days ago

      The same Hezbollah that claim this was an “act of war” and in nothing I can find give any indication of non Hezbollah casualties? Once again I can link the translated statement from Hezbollah to support this, but since you for some reason will not neither will I.

      Oh and to show this is not a lack of effort by myself here is a link to the information on Vitamin D toxicity

      • crashfrog@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        0·
        14 days ago

        The same Hezbollah that claim this was an “act of war” and in nothing I can find give any indication of non Hezbollah casualties?

        Why would Hezbollah report non-Hezbollah casualties? They’re not the government of Lebanon.

        • czech@lemm.ee
          0·
          14 days ago

          You wrote that fewer than .1% of casualties from the detonations were not hezbollah. When asked for a source you wrote: hezbollah. When pressed for a source you’ve now countered: “why would hezbollah report that?”.

          We don’t know; it’s your premise. Where did you get that stat?