• lemme_at_it@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read a theory about why Ukraine has not completely destroyed the bridge to Crimea, even if they were able to, was to leave a way out & not fight the occupying troops into a corner, at which point their destructive unpredictability is worse than just letting them leave . This could be similar

    • severien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, that doesn’t make a lot of sense. Russia has enough boats/ships to evacuate Crimea if they wanted. They used to supply the whole Crimea woth ships before the bridge was built.

      If Ukraine could, they would definitely destroy the bridge. But it’s just very difficult task.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Putin would forbid any evacuation plans. A bridge allows scared soldiers a way to run away without permission from command.

        • severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          WTF, the bridge has checkpoints on both sides, you’re not going to somehow sneak thousands of soldiers.

            • severien@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You think they would mutiny? Then they can just steal some of the many ships in the harbors.

              And again, 20 km long bridge is a perfect place to destroy / stop whatever you want. It’s a chokepoint, hell to get through if the other sode doesn’t want to let you go through.