• V0ldek@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    The thing with IVF is that it’s already incredibly weirdly eugenicist.

    Like, read some of the parameters they’d screen you for if you wanted to donate sperm. You get bonus points for having a PhD? I’m sorry? You’re looking for a better-educated sperm?

    And when you apply for IVF and choose a donor you get their education and job. “I want my cum to be a pilot!” The fuck.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think it’s understandable. Intelligence is partly hereditary and people want clever children. Education and job can give you at least an overall idea of the person you’re having a child with. It’s kind of weird anyway to have a child with someone random, isn’t it?

      • V0ldek@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s kind of weird anyway to have a child with someone random, isn’t it?

        In my mind “being inseminated by” is like 1% of “having a child with”, if that. It’s probably the least consequential thing your father may do in your overall upbringing.

          • blakestacey@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 hours ago

            OK, you could in principle have made that sound worse, for example by saying “females” like a goddamn Ferengi, but still, pretty impressive.

            • angrystego@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 minutes ago

              And that was my whole point, I was reacting to V0ldek’s: “being inseminated by…is the least consequential thing”, which they proposed was not important from the child’s point of view. I wanted to point out it’s rather different (in a bad way) from the woman’s point of view.

              Is that a bad thing? Where did I go wrong in expressing myself? Or did I misunderstand V0ldek’s comment?