• Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the vast majority of people with the time to go to college (customers) are 18-24

      Any time you see something like this: lobbyists were involved

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s unfortunate but at least it’s a step forward. Who knows maybe in a couple years the people can vote to just have it free for all ages.

    • Pistcow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Be like me where my parents made too much but wouldn’t support me so I had to wait until 25 to get my AA because of the bulkshit fafsa income rules.

    • wrath-sedan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a bill in the works called the CHERISH Act in Massachusetts that would allow all residents to graduate community college debt-free (note not actually free just support people enough they don’t go into debt).

      Mass Reconnect (the program in the article) was created from 20 million dollars taken from the new Mass millionaires’ tax. CHERISH is estimated to cost about 500 million (a great investment but definitely a scale of magnitude larger)

      I think what’s crazy about CHERISH is that it would raise state investment in each student just to the level seen in 2001. Crazy how much even states like Mass have cut education funding in the last 20 years.

    • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      probably the only way banking lobbyists would allow it to pass, they still need the most vulnerable chunk of the age groups going to college, and the lion’s share of them.