• kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s horrifying that she’s jailed for having been attacked. What the fuck is wrong with you, Arizona?

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    She was attacked and defended herself so she got arrested and her attackers got off completely free. That’s some peak school zero tolerance policy bullshit. It’s also completely insane she has a 500k bail but Trump, who tried to overturn and destroy our democracy so that he could establish a dictatorship only has 200k. This singular case should be provided when people disagree that Trans people are being attacked and persecuted all across the country.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In “So-called Flagstaff, Arizona”.

    Um, I think the name of the town is not is question here.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t care if you don’t like guns. Arm up, learn to shoot, and protect yourselves out there. One political side has been stockpiling for decades (it’s even part of their culture) while the other side is willingly disarming themselves.

    • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Curious how that would help here?

      She got arrested for being the victim. If she shoots her attacker do you think the cops wouldn’t have still arrested her?

      Unless you meant protect ourselves from the cops, but running gun battles with the cops isn’t going to help anyone.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        The presence of a firearm itself may have been enough to make them think twice. I mean, do you normally try to assault someone who’s visibly carrying?

        • violetraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Isn’t this what gun rights people say to women who then become statistically more likely to be shot by their own weapon?

        • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The presence of a firearm itself may have been enough to make them think twice. I mean, do you normally try to assault someone who’s visibly carrying?

          A gun that can be seen is a gun that can be wrestled away from you, especially if you are physically smaller or weaker than your assailant. It’s also an item of value begging to be stolen the second you’re not completely in command of your surroundings.

          It’s also a good way to get shot pre-emptively by a cop who actually does have adequate gun safety training but no morality to go along with it, simply because he’s a hunter and your open carry visible weapon made you fair game. “I feared for my life” is all he will have to say, and you will just be one more statistic without ever even having drawn it, especially if you are a minority or a member of some other group they don’t like.

          That kind of firearm-as-fashion-deterrent only appeals to LARPers. People who take gun ownership with the absolute seriousness it requires do not open carry casually, nor do they pull out a gun unless they are about to fire it. This is casual, ignorant, deadly irresponsibility and a big part of why we have the firearm problems we do in this country right now.

          • Zippy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The majority of people likely would have a difficult time pulling the trigger even if they did brandish a gun. Possibly more so with women.

            So now you have any escalated situation with a much higher chance of death for the person holding the gun.

  • bartlebee@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It felt like there wasn’t any context to the actual circumstances of her arrest, especially considering the exorbitantly high bail amount. I looked around and the most information I could actually find was through a motion filed by her attorney.

    She is being held for aggravated assault x2 along with some other misdemeanor charges with an implication that the charges will be elevated to attempted murder. Her attorney also notes that she has numerous other felony charges over the years, many but not all of which were later plead down to misdemeanor charges. Epona is also noted as homeless and a transient that had outstanding warrants for failing to appear for some of her charges in other states. She has outstanding warrants for this in at least one other state. Assuming that it is true that she is transient and the DA intends to upgrade her charges to attempted murder, this at least provides some ideas as to why the bail amount seems ludicrously high on the surface.

    I realize that virtually all trans individuals face an extremely unwelcoming response from society that can often include abject violence and I feel true empathy for those that carry that burden. In this particular case it seems that there are lots of details that may deviate from the narrative that this particular individual was simply attacked by a group of men while minding her own business. Perhaps I’m wrong, but the original link is very one-sided which is why I went looking for more information. There are no journalistic articles covering the attack, but the motion filed by Epona’s lawyer is moderately revealing.