Some politicians are so fearful of former President Donald Trump retaking the White House that “they don’t really want to tell the full truth,” West said. “[Biden has] created the best economy that we can get. Is this the best that we can get? You don’t tell that lie to the people just for Biden to win,” West said in a clip played on CNN Sunday.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    [Biden has] created the best economy that we can get…You don’t tell that lie to the people just for Biden to win

    Straw man arguments like this are what makes it so obvious Cornell West is full of shit. There isn’t a single damn person who ever said that, but Cornell West wants you to think it’s a majority opinion that he’s fighting against.

    Back in the real world, we recognize Biden has taken some serious steps in the right direction regarding infrastructure investment, empowering labor, reducing student loan debt, and increasing the portion of taxes paid by the wealthy, among other things. In the real world, we recognize this is as far as he can go with a razor thin Senate majority that depends on the votes of Manchin and Sinema, and we recognize he now has a Republican House to stymy every one of his priorities.

    To get progressive policies passed, elect more Democrats to the House and Senate and reelect Joe Biden

        • DLSchichtl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ma’am, please don’t feed the troll. Just block TokenBoomer and move along. Your lemmy experience will thank you.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having refuted or defeated an opponent’s proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., “stand up a straw man”) and the subsequent refutation of that false argument (“knock down a straw man”) instead of the opponent’s proposition.

          [Biden has] created the best economy that we can get…You don’t tell that lie to the people just for Biden to win

          You assume that West has created a straw man. He claims that the economy could be better. Whether it’s true or not is up to the reader. In order for it to be a straw man, it would have to be untrue. If it is true, then it is not a straw man.

          Let’s assume that his statement is true. That the economy could be better. By treating it as untrue, you create the straw man. You then proceed to refute his assertion by listing Biden’s economic accomplishments, thus tearing down the straw man you created.

          Remember, this is all dependent on whether West’s statement is true or not. If the reader thinks it true. Then it is not a straw man.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You heavily edited this after I responded, so here’s my edit. Cornell West is saying “THEY are saying this is the best economy you can get. I don’t think this is the best it can get!” The first statement, literally no one is saying that. It’s an argument he invented to argue against. It is not true. The second statement is something literally everyone agrees with. Everyone would like to be doing better financially. Cornell West made up an argument and then knocked it down with something everyone agrees with.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              To be fair, I don’t think the use of the Straw Man Fallacy is appropriate concerning the economy. Because a good or bad economy is open to interpretation. But you used the term, creating a de facto “straw man.” You then refuted it. I’m not defending West or his statement. And I find it fascinating how you were able to do that. Thus, my comment.

              Edit: I am not a logician. This is just how I interpreted it.