What an utter piece of shit.

    • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. Assisting putler’s genocide against Ukrainian children is a war crime.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah. According to the article, he straight up told the top military brass of the Biden administration right afterwards and they did nothing. No prosecution, no whistle-blowing to the press about a war crime. Nothing.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Prosecute him, of course! Maybe hit him with sanctions for directly supporting the Russian war effort? Because that’s what stopping an attack on their fleet is.

                • olympicyes@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Krolden is asking specifically what crime he should be charged with, implying you would struggle to find one. This certainly isn’t treason against the US because the US is not legally involved in the war. It’s unclear from their post whether they support Ukraine or Russia in the conflict so I’d suggest taking it at face value.

                  • getynge@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They already said, sabotage. I’m not going to pretend I know the law but sabotaging a military to which we are actively providing aid is likely frowned upon. Prosecution may not be a possibility though, but I imagine this is giving regulators ammo for later.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        So if you’re not an American you’re free to sabotage the US as much as you want and it’s not a crime?

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          So if you’re not an American you’re free to sabotage the US as much as you want and it’s not a crime?

          Two points.

          First, US laws apply on US soil, or to US citizens. If you’re neither, then cooperation and extradition agreements apply, if there are any.

          Second, not sure where you got the “sabotage the US” part from:

          • the request came from Ukraine
          • from the beginning, Musk has been sabotaging Russia by disabling Starlink outside of Ukrainian borders, this was supported by both Ukraine and the US
          • the Ukrainian request was for removing part of the sabotage so Ukraine could attack Russia with Ukrainian drones
          • it wasn’t a US request, it didn’t involve any US assets, or any US operations

          Maybe Ukraine should have asked the US, instead of asking a private non-Ukrainian citizen.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            First, US laws apply on US soil, or to US citizens. If you’re neither, then cooperation and extradition agreements apply, if there are any.

            Yup, and the US charges non-citzens that are not on their soil all the time. If they can’t get the extradition there’s nothing they can do about it unless the person sets foot on US soil, but that doesn’t stop it from being a criminal offence or from the person being charged.

            Second, not sure where you got the “sabotage the US” part from

            It was an analogy. The person I was replying to seemed to be saying “It can’t be a criminal offence because Musk isn’t Ukranian” which is nonsense. I assumed they where likely American and used an example of something closer to home to show why that is incorrect.

          • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            First, US laws apply on US soil, or to US citizens. If you’re neither, then cooperation and extradition agreements apply, if there are any.

            No, this is demonstrably false in many areas of law.

            For example OFAC explicitly targets non US persons and organizations in sanctions enforcement. It is explicitly written into nearly every presidential order authorizing sanctions. I’d be happy to direct you to a few if you like, but you can just pick any from here: https://ofac.treasury.gov

        • CaptainAlcohol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well if he hasn’t a contract there (with the ministry of defence) he can do whatever, he’s ultimately in control of starlink. Long story short, don’t trust a private business with these things without signed contracts.

        • sergih@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but it’s not called treason, treason is to your own country, ofc this is still an illegal offense in Ukraine but I don’t think it’s treason?