• OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    The 8000th “Covid killed cities” article, just shifting the goalposts and jumping around to different cities with different metrics out of context to make it seem worse than it is.

        • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          They do too, but the cost of living (a problem exacerbated by capitalism treating property as an investment) has pushed workers out of cities, which kills the ability of businesses to keep employees, and thus the downtown empties of businesses like restaurants.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Urbanization has been increasing globally for hundreds of years. Nothing killed cities.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m saying cities aren’t dying. Cities reinvent themselves when they have issues. Oh no, the textile industry is leaving NYC after WWII and the area those factories were in is considered a slum, the city is dying… and now that area is SoHo.

        If this article was just trying to say “cities are still working their way back to pre-covid commercial activity levels” then sure, there is a temporary issue from a generational pandemic, agreed. But if you think people are going to stop moving to cities long term you are just wrong.

        • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean the author is basically saying what you’re saying. the title definitely left off a keyword from the title : "[Traditional] Downtowns are dead, dying or on life support… " with their definition of traditional downtowns being only business focused downtowns, rather than muxed usage downtowns