Newsweek

  • hh93@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    ofc is should be avoided at all cost - but the way it looks now it’s pretty much impossible to avoid given how Hamas is playing this…

    • shrugal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think your and my definition of “at all costs” is a bit different.

      • hh93@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you believe Hamas would avoid civil casualties if Israel didn’t do those strikes and let them do whatever they wanted?

        • shrugal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think It’s pretty obvious that Hamas has never been and will never be able to kill nearly as many people as Israel is killing right now.

          • hh93@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So they should have free reign to kill Israelis unpunished whenever they want since it’s impossible to get to them without casualties because of how they play it?

            • shrugal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              How is that the only alternative you can think of?! This black or white thinking is total bullshit. Israel is easily strong enough to prevent most attacks and work towards a peaceful solution.