He was the one player that looked to be creating something when we were losing. Was a bit surprised we subbed him off (thought Saka for Trossard would have been the better sub) but it worked out anyways
Me too, I think people were understandably frustrated at the team’s performance and came away with the feeling that nobody played well. Martinelli and Rice came to play, I think both of Saliba & Gabriel were good enough too, and Saka had his moment of brilliance to salvage an otherwise forgettable performance. The rest of the team was invisible at best and exposed at worst.
![[RESULTS] Post Match Ratings | Chelsea 2-2 Arsenal](https://alien.top/pictrs/image/2ff00093-b5ea-4a51-82b4-62ce1df4695f.webp){kind=link}
I thought martinelli had a great game 🤷♂️
He was the one player that looked to be creating something when we were losing. Was a bit surprised we subbed him off (thought Saka for Trossard would have been the better sub) but it worked out anyways
He was starting to look gassed so think it was on point
Saka got an assist and martinelli still got higher rating so I would say people kinda agree with you
Me too, I think people were understandably frustrated at the team’s performance and came away with the feeling that nobody played well. Martinelli and Rice came to play, I think both of Saliba & Gabriel were good enough too, and Saka had his moment of brilliance to salvage an otherwise forgettable performance. The rest of the team was invisible at best and exposed at worst.
6/10 is fair then no? Didn’t have a bad game but didn’t effect it.
He tried and worked hard but Gusto had him locked down and he didn’t get a shot on target, a 6 is fair.
Great game is a bit of a hyperbole, he was decent, and a 6/10 on a 0-10 scale is above average.
All he could muster was knocking it off Gusto for a corner really. Great is overstating it.
He played alright