• minoscopede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    People are scared of saying good things about Biden because it makes them a target for tankies and republicans.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I see you’re new - welcome to Lemmy! If you see any tankies or republiQans you don’t want to see, block them. It’s pretty easy.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        All that does is make them more powerful because there are fewer voices pushing back against them.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      You don’t see any irony in re-using Nixon’s “silent majority” like trump did in 2016?

      For that to be true, you have to disregard all polling, which is sadly something I’ve seen people doing.

      Because you don’t just have to explain his lack of support on social media and real life, you have to explain away his lack.of support in anonymous polling and why “he’s not trump” is consistently the most popular reason for voting Biden.

      He just doesn’t have support, people just want to stop trump.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 days ago

    A good government is a boring government. I don’t want SLAMS in a congressional meeting. I want boring questions about tiny little details on spreadsheets nobody reads except for interns and wonks.

  • Asifall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I genuinely feel like the climate is just a no win situation from a political perspective. Any real solution has pretty serious tradeoffs so either you take small low impact steps which are panned as being too little too late, or you take bold steps that hurt some significant group economically.

      • Asifall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean same, but inevitably it will also hurt everyone who buys oil which is pretty much everyone in America. Still it has to happen

        • morphballganon@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          They can get onboard with renewables themselves. Anyone who bemoans change instead of adapting doesn’t deserve our sympathy.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Because the Democratic tent is filled with lazy cynics who actively sabotage outreach efforts, because mindlessly parroting propaganda is way easier than actual civic engagement.

  • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’d say because Dems have been spending so much time telling everyone how horrible Trump is, that they forgot to mention why anyone might also consider Biden good

  • cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The Biden admin’s main selling point on climate is bragging about how much funding they’ve gotten from Congress. That’s a legislative achievement, but the execution part – which is the point of their branch of government – has been incredibly rocky. You got $7.5B in funding for EV charging yielding 8 EV chargers nationwide. And Biden has slapped big tariffs on Chinese solar panels and EVs, so that renewables will get more expensive and American carmakers who are skeptical about the EV transition will get to drag their feet even more.

    • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      My next car purchase will at the very least be a PHEV, if not a full EV. But my current gas car is fine, so I have no immediate need to purchase one. I don’t consider that as dragging my feet. I’ll buy it when I need it.

      • Chris Saturn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m with you. A car is an expensive purchase, so it’s difficult to justify rushing into a new one. But I’ll definitely be going either PHEV or EV on my next vehicle.

      • cyd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        From the individual consumer’s point of view, it totally makes sense to keep guzzling gasoline. US gas prices are far cheaper than elsewhere in the developed world, even after inflation. US carmakers have priced EVs at premium price points, and the charging infrastructure is mediocre. Add to this Biden’s lock-out of EV imports and efforts to keep gas prices down ahead of the elections.

        Anyway, it’s a difficult set of problems, but I would not characterize Biden administration’s climate record as being “full of wins”. They’re like a startup that brags about receiving lots of VC funding (big wins!), but flailing about when it comes to delivering an actual product.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    How much climate damage is being caused by the 2 US proxy wars, an ever expanding military which is the world’s largest individual polluter?

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    Because reading any news headlines is like drinking from a firehose of liquid shit.

    Reading climate change news is like drinking from a firehose of liquid misery and hopelessness.

    High odds people skip all that to go play games or read a book. Or even to go outside and enjoy it while it lasts.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    Because, like a lot of Biden policies, they are wins on paper but have little to no impact on voters daily lives.

    Example:

    https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-biden-administration-has-taken-more-climate-action-than-any-other-in-history

    “The Biden administration is the first to embrace the goal of reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by midcentury in order to stabilize global temperatures at 1.5 degrees Celsius of warming.* That means that the Biden administration’s interim target—cutting U.S. carbon pollution to half of peak levels by 2030—requires reducing annual carbon pollution nearly four times faster than the Obama administration’s interim target did.** Ambitious policy goals drive ambitious policy change.”

    Sounds great, right? But all he did was set a goal. Are we making progress to that goal? 🤷‍♂️ Is that goal even achievable? 🤷‍♂️ 2030 is only 6 years away, how are we doing right now? 🤷‍♂️

    It’s meaningless babble to claim this as an achievement if you can’t point to a tangible change in the numbers.

    No matter who wins in 2024, they aren’t going to be President in 2030. If Trump wins in '24, or another Republican wins in '28, this goal is out the window.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Biden rejoined the Paris Climate Agreement, revoked the Keystone Pipeline permit, created a 13 million acre federal petroleum reserve for Alaskan wildlife, greatly increased oil site lease cost, signed $7B in solar subsidies, enacted the Inflation Reduction act to support clean energy…

      • ZeroCool@vger.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yes, but you see, if you ignore all of that… Then Biden hasn’t done anything and it’s all just “meaningless babble!”

      • HWK_290@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Exactly. How dare he set goals and then take incremental steps to achieve them? The nerve!

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        6 days ago

        And how much of that matters to the average voter, sitting around with no air conditioning, reading reports about the “hottest year on record” 4 years in a row?

        None of that means anything to the average voter.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s how these efforts work - they start as a goal. It gets announced after enough support signs on, and they get the policies and money together, then they start spinning up the agencies and addressing the problems and . . . it’s how big things work.

      If you want to declare something and have it immediately be so, you have to do it in a videogame.

      If you’re worried that we won’t get far before idiot christofascist qultists fuck it up, well. Welcome to the party pal.jpg. Don’t boo - vote!

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        What I’m saying is, if you want the voters to notice, you have to actually do something. Setting a goal is nothing. Then they go “look at what we did!” yeah, you haven’t done ANYTHING yet.

        Another example, all the EV chargers…

        https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/05/congress-ev-chargers-billions-00129996

        It’s great to have a goal to build charging stations. It’s not a WIN until you can point to tangible progress.

        How many built? Last I checked it was around 9? How many are in permitting? 🤷‍♂️ How many are actively being constructed? 🤷‍♂️

        Don’t tout all the things you’ve “done” when you haven’t actually done anything yet.

        “Look at me! I set a goal to lose 175 pounds by August!”

        “Can you actually lose 5 pounds a day every day for 36 days?”

        “🤷‍♂️ But hey! I set the goal! That’s just as good!”

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      It should be because, like a lot of Biden policies, the on paper win is actually shoveling tons of taxpayer money to the individuals and institutions who have caused the underlying problem he claims to be solving (see also; basically everything Biden has done with police accountability), money fossil fuel companies are going to plow right into lobbying and PR work to further ensure nobody can have a rational conversation about what our country is doing, but, yeah, you’re probably right that for the vast majority of voters it’s just that they don’t see it in their daily lives at all

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Because, like a lot of Biden policies, they are wins on paper but have little to no impact on voters daily lives.

      It’s not new either.

      Biden makes big promises, fails miserably, makes a token gesture, and then people claim he’s the best ever…

      At a Glasgow climate summit in 2021, the Biden administration offered a commitment to the world: The United States would stop the public financing of oil and gas projects. There would be no more American tax dollars for new natural gas pipelines or wells, the White House said

      The pledge drew praise from climate change activists. But there was one big problem—it was an empty promise.

      In the years since Glasgow, the US has continued to finance fossil fuel projects around the world. The latest example came Thursday, when the US Export-Import Bank finalized a plan to guarantee part of the financing for a $4.2 billion revitalization of natural gas production in the nation of Bahrain. The move—which comes just weeks after the Biden administration triumphantly announced a freeze on the domestic development of new projects designed to export liquified natural gas—will include the construction of dozens of gas wells and 450 new oil wells. It will bring online as much as 5.2 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, or about five years of additional gas production at Bahrain’s current levels.

      https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2024/03/biden-promised-not-to-finance-fossil-fuels-so-why-is-the-us-backing-a-huge-gas-project/

      To quote Kendrick:

      The audience not dumb

      Shape the stories how you want, hey, Drake, they’re not slow

      Biden, his campaign, and his supporters don’t realize people can just fact check this shit from their phones in two seconds. Voters aren’t as stupid as they keep acting we are.

      If we were, we’d probably be voting Republican…

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s probably why they don’t seem interested in advertising Biden’s “accomplishments”… Instead just beating that Trump bad drum all day everyday

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        we were, we’d probably be voting Republican…

        Its clear from how Biden has managed his 2024 campaign he’d rather Republicans as supporters, so that tracks.