• PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    NASA changed its nomenclature to say human space flight (as opposed to just “manned” space flight) in the 90’s, you transphobic Christian nationalist.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So… The Party of “small government” once again banning using language that’s inclusive of all people. Disgusting…

  • Ibex0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    What were they thinking?

    Oh shit, I just used the gender-neutral pronoun “they.”

      • Ibex0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        In this case yes, but “they” can also be all men, all women, or a single person of unknown gender.

        For example: somebody called. What did they say?

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So instead of using they like a normal person would, they have to use something like s/he throughout entire documents? How clunky and ugly that must be.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Reminds me of when North Carolinas own oceanic and atmospheric agency published a study on the negative effects climate change will have on their coastal towns, and what they need to do in response to that.

    So their state government responded by banning the use of terms like climate change.

  • Happenchance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    So what they are saying is that it’s perfectly fine to address every man as “her, she” incorrectly, every time. Perfect.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    To conservatives, cultural war is a real issue. It’s not like they care about anything else, as far as their concerned they’re going to heaven one way or another. Why plan for today when you can be happy about imaginary tomorrows.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      If they don’t keep people fighting about who can marry who or who should have control over medical decisions, people might start fighting about things that will threaten their wealth and power.

  • Ibex0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Rather than ‘pregnant people’ or ‘pregnant person,’ use ‘pregnant women’ or ‘pregnant mom.’

    And if she’s a child? And is she a mom while still pregnant?

    • Nepenthe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      And is she a mom while still pregnant?

      I would say so, yeah. “The mother of the fetus” sounds fine. “Mother’s womb.” It’s not like men aren’t the father until it’s born.

      Excepting the questionable case of surrogacy, the term “pregnant mom” feels wrong to me because it’s redundant.

        • Nepenthe@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          host

          I don’t even like kids, but what a gross thing to be called. Unless it’s a bouncing baby cordyceps, I’m going to stick with expectant mother.

          Logically, you are absolving men of fatherhood for a year? Or what are we calling them? Donor?

  • SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So this has nothing to do with the word they. This is TREF nonsense that by using words like pregnant person, the “patriarchy” is erasing women.

  • JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Excellent. The sooner this stupidity ends, the better. You’re not a “they.” You’re a man or a woman and if you struggle to accept your body then you should see a therapist.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Not one problem in your life is the result of a person you know (or even a person you don’t know) wanting to be referred to as ‘they.’

      Not one.

      Edit: LOL of course it was [email protected] - so I guess you do have some problem that someone else’s pronouns have caused for you?

    • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Trans and nonbinary people have existed for as long as humanity has. Your perception of this “stupidity” as new is the result of people finally overcoming hundreds of years of religious programming; bigotry that has been passed down for generations as superstitious fear anyone presenting in an unfamiliar way, and people are now more willing to express themselves as they actually feel, rather than as they feel they must in order to protect themselves.

      Here’s a short piece of a lecture by a Stanford professor explaining how wrong you are. https://youtu.be/8QScpDGqwsQ

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Did you notice that you have no problem using the gender-neutral pronoun “you” in this comment?

      It’s almost like this isn’t something you actually care about, but just see as something to justify irrational hatred of people. That’s kinda weird, lady.

      • superguy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think the problem is those who have issues with the words ‘he and she.’

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Bro this and that has literally nothing to do with each other. “They” has been used for when you don’t know the person’s gender since the 15th century.

      • superguy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        How long has he and she been used when you do know the person’s gender?

          • superguy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Uhh, what?

            Looks like the people who have problems with ‘he and she’ are the ones who want something to be angry about.

    • superguy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve found America is pretty much the only nation where ideas like these have gotten hold.

      The rest of the word recognizes it for what it is and just decides to steer clear.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      This bullshit again. Just because it doesn’t affect you directly doesn’t mean it’s not the right thing to do! I’ll never have kids but I support maternity/paternity leave. I’m not Muslim but I want them to not be harassed in public. I don’t have a vagina but think menstrual items should be universally available.

      • superguy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I never said it was right or wrong.

        Just that it didn’t affect me.