On Monday, it appears X attempted to encourage users to cease referring to it as Twitter and instead adopt the name X. Some users began noticing that posts viewed via X for iOS were changing any references of “Twitter.com” to “X.com” automatically.

If a user typed in “Twitter.com,” they would see “Twitter.com” as they typed it before hitting “Post.” But, after submitting, the platform would show “X.com” in its place on the X for iOS app, without the user’s permission, for everyone viewing the post.

And shortly after this revelation, it became clear that there was another big issue: X was changing anything ending in “Twitter.com” to “X.com.”

  • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    X is just a BAAAAAAD brand that it’s almost insulting the people who uses it, honestly were I’m from it sounds like an adult website…

  • Hypx@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    People need to stop using Twitter. It’s like trying to using AOL or whatever now. It’s basically a dead product.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      6 months ago

      I am so puzzled by this. I’ve been using the Internet for 30 years, and in early 2000 people were much more standing up to principles. The greatest example was when digg changed how it operated with v4, people left it overnight. Now they prefer to be fucked over and don’t have any intention of changing it, and excuses are really lame like “alternatives are too hard”.

      I think Yuval Harari was right and social media figured out how to hack our brains and control us.

      • puppy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not only laymen either. I have Software Engineering friends who continue to use Twitter because RSS, Mastodon or any other alternative is “hard”. They have no core values or integrity whatsoever.

        • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Why are they your friends, then?

          Edit: I should have added more context. I’m not saying you shouldn’t be friends with Twitter users. I was referring to this:

          They have no core values or integrity whatsoever.

          I wouldn’t want to be friends with someone with “no integrity whatsoever.”

          • mark@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I really hope this is sarcasm. I couldn’t imagine basing my friendships solely on whether or not they use Twitter.

            • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              No, that’s not what I meant, though I’ve updated my original comment to add more context.

              OP wrote:

              They have no core values or integrity whatsoever.

              Well, fuck that. Don’t be “friends” with people like that.

      • olympicyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Reddit already existed and was a better option than Digg v3, sort of like how Digg was more useful than Fark for many. I don’t think there is a good replacement for Twitter yet because the people that create the best content are addicted to it.

    • stellargmite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      News sites also need to stop going on about it. Its like feeding the troll. I’ve never used the thing other than looking at it briefly in its early days, and yet I’m constantly hearing about it. And here I am commenting about this apparently (Western) globally important website which has served no purpose in my life. What a waste of energy all around. Self perpetuating negative feedback loop tech wank. Digital town square my arse. The little I know about it is from bad headlines which I wish I could unsee as its of zero consequence.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s a whole host of modern journalists who don’t know how the fuck to do their jobs without twitter, I’d put money on that being the reason we still read so much about it

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I have stopped using it to read news. I still use it to keep touch with my professional community (scientists who haven’t moved to Bluesky or Mastodon), but that’s it. I wish it would just die. Until then I’ve scripted it and blocked lots of elements to make it look exactly like old Twitter

    • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I too have underestimated the glee of right wing trolls at twitters turn around. They are keeping it alive somehow.

  • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why not just switch your site redirects? Instead of x.com opening twitter.com make them go to x, and eventually stop the redirects and put a landing page on Twitter with a link to x.com. How do you expect people to stop calling it Twitter when that’s literally the site name even if you type in x.com

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    The only time it’s ok to dead name anyone is, Twitter. Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Suck it elon!

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t care what they do. If I have to refer to that social media platform/shitshow of a vanity project in any way whatsoever, I’m calling it Twitter.

      • cum@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        They already are on that alt-right shit hole. Too bad people are too brain broken to love their outrage propaganda garbage.

  • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Petty.

    He doesn’t have control over what others think and say no matter what he tries.

    Social media should be owned and operated by the people.

    Love you lemmy/mastaon

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not just petty, but incredibly stupid. He bought one of the most recognizable brands on the planet. Everyone knows what a tweet is, a retweet, a quote tweet, hell, hashtags exploded in popularity because of Twitter. An entire community (re: customer base) self-organizing and inventing the concepts of your product for you, organically and for free - it’s any business owner’s wettest of wet dreams.

      And then he threw that all down the drain because he couldn’t recognize what was right in front of his face. Either that or he did recognize, but still wanted to relive some tech fantasy he cooked up twenty years ago and can’t let go of. Either way, astronomically, gigantically, absolutely unfathomably stupid.

        • preppietechie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          There is that (probably untrue) theory that the main reason he bought Twitter was because at the time, Twitter wouldn’t ban the ElonJet tracking account. Were that the case, it would kinda/sorta make sense that he’s want to kill the platform.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve been thinking about this while on the toilet. Why there? Because that’s about the only time I waste time thinking about Twitter.

    Call it X. Call it muskX. Call it whatever

    But don’t call it Twitter

    See, twitter is dead. X is trying to capitalize on the corpse.

    Continuing to call it Twitter just gives validity and credibility to X by pretending that it’s the same thing under a different name.

    Call it Shitter, call it anything but what gives musk any validation at all

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m thankful that with my overkill combination of Firefox security extensions and various adblockers that they have completely broken the bird site from ever loading for me.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nope. Twitter. My tracker blocker still shows that the URLs for them are coming from Twitter, and I’m pretty sure if you go to X it still redirects to Twitter. I don’t know why this is the case, but it is. I have no idea why he’d want to buy a recognizable company and remove the recognition though.

  • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    What happened to Xitter being a paragon of free speech? You can’t even say “twitter.com” without them censoring you.

    How unfortunate they can’t deal with the spam bots quite so effectively.