• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      What is the UN human rights chief supposed to do about it?

      He did all that was in his power:

      Volker Türk told an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council there must be an independent and transparent investigation of the two attacks in Lebanon on Tuesday and Wednesday where these devices exploded, reportedly killing 37 people and injuring more than 3,400 others.

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        They could all say they are going to disband if Israel doesn’t stop. Why even have the UN if they can’t do anything

        Or better yet expel isreal

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          First of all, that’s also not in his power.

          Secondly, how would disbanding the part of the UN that investigates human rights abuses help Palestinians?

          Edit: Wait, you think the entire UN should be disbanded over this?

          The UN is the only reason we haven’t had a nuclear war yet. Otherwise, countries wouldn’t have a neutral world forum.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 days ago

              That’s not what the UN is for… it’s not a military force… it’s a round table for nations to work their differences out via words and not nuking each other.

              • Lad@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                People like to criticise the UN but the alternative to having the UN is having no UN. We’d be fucked

                • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  We need something more than the UN that has real power to stop Israel’s terror and genocide. The UN can fuck off and prevent it’s theoretical events elsewhere.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          How would you react if the UN becomes the world government, so that they would finally have the power to stop wars and hunger that people always complain about?

          Precisely.

          • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            I may be ok with that depending on the governing structure they came up with for a world government. Like would it be a democracy? Socialism? It really depends lol

            But right now it seems very ineffective if America or Israel does something horrible they can just veto or whatever and nothing gets done.

            As an American myself I would love it if the UN actually had powers to keep my government in line. they sure as hell don’t listen to the will of the people.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      They are…

      They’ve had arrest warrants out for a while, but they do t have their own police force to enforce it

      It relies on member states arresting them when they enter their country. It why Bibi hasn’t been going anywhere besides America. Biden is one of the few leaders willing to side with Israel over the UN

  • DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    We’re talking double secret probation. Super cereal shit man.

    Constantly wringing my hands at the lack of adults in leadership. Accountability ends atrocity.

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    In one sense this is much worse, and more terrifying than the run-of-the-mill IED’s used by militant groups. Having to be suspicious of everything around you would be maddening. It’s indiscriminate mass psychological warfare, where the collateral damage goes way beyond the people actually carrying the devices.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      OK, I’m gonna tell a little story that we used to tell in my part of the country. In my part of the country they grow a lot of watermelons.

      So there was this watermelon farmer who got upset that everybody kept sneaking into his fields at night and taking watermelons.

      So he came up with his great idea that he put a sign at the edge of the field that said one of these watermelons is poison. Now he knew that no one could take a watermelon cause they wouldn’t know which one was poisoned. He was quite proud of this idea.

      So we came back in the morning to see how his sign worked. And sure enough no watermelons have been taken overnight.

      However, he noticed the number one on his sign had been crossed out and somebody had put two.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        However, he noticed the number one on his sign had been crossed out and somebody had put two.

        That is both genius and a total Bond villain origin story.

    • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      How is it “indiscriminate” if solely Hezbollah operatives were targeted?

      A booby-trapped baby stroller is indiscriminate - it goes off when anyone touches it, friend, foe, or child. Israel attacked the communications of its enemy and literally nothing else. That’s inherently discriminating between friend and foe.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        How is it “indiscriminate” if solely Hezbollah operatives were targeted?

        Because said operatives were often within exploding distance of civilians when the pagers were detonated. Shrapnel, even from a small explosion, can be deadly and has a fairly large range. Especially if you don’t have line-of-sight to your target before detonating the device; you have no idea what or who is nearby when it goes off.

        “Explosive” and “targeted” generally don’t go hand-in-hand.

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Attacking a civilian population of a country you’re not at war with is a violation of international law.

    And Isreal has done it at least nine times in the last year.

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Feels like increasingly that is the new reality for all of us, everything is a potential attack vector, even if it’s much less lethal attacks. Data grabs, money grabs, attention grabs. Show me something weaponizable that isn’t being exploited as one in one way or another.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Honestly, the real question to me is how many innocent people were maimed, injured, or killed in this attack. This is incredibly indiscriminate, even though the idea is that only the bad guys are holding the pages or walkie-talkies, but if they’re in a cafe they’re not the only ones getting hurt. Think of it as attaching an explosive to a thousand Hezbollah people, and then exploding them as they wander through a city. That’s the true crime, the potentially disproportionate massacre of innocent civilians.

    • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Honestly, the real question to me is how many innocent people were maimed, injured, or killed in this attack.

      Quite a bit fewer than 0.1% of the individual detonations appear to have harmed anyone except the Hezbollah operative assigned to the pager, so this doesn’t actually appear to be a question. The attack was extremely discriminate and targeted.

      but if they’re in a cafe they’re not the only ones getting hurt.

      In every case in which one of these went off in a cafe, the intended target was the only one hurt.

      That’s the true crime, the potentially disproportionate massacre of innocent civilians.

      But that isn’t what happened. The opposite happened.

            • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              Hezbollah publicly announces their war casualties so they’re the source

              I don’t know how to explain that any more clearly. If you’re still puzzled, I recommend asking a question instead of posting a single word

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 days ago

                They are asking for the source of your statement that less then 0.1% of the victims where valid targets. Since most have seen evidence to the exact opposite of that statement.

                Oh and although I can put links to back that statement up, I will not. (Since that is the presiding fashion here apparently)

                • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  They are asking for the source of your statement that less then 0.1% of the victims where valid targets

                  Hezbollah is the source. That’s three times I’ve said so. What about that is still unclear?

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Several of the victims were children. They went off in crowds. There was no way they could control that many devices with precision when they set them off all at once like that.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            That particular pager was in a bag, against a person, pointed away from anyone or anything else. Not to mention anything of the second attack, which used much larger charges and started fires and blew out windows across Lebanon.

            And anyway, a single example isn’t going to assuage anyone who has been reading reports of women and children dying from the attack.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              They’re also ignoring the literal terror being experienced by civilians who witnessed people’s legs and faces being blown off in public.

              That’s terrorism.

            • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              That particular pager was in a bag, against a person, pointed away from anyone or anything else.

              Where else would you carry a pager? You have to feel it when it vibrates.

              Not to mention anything of the second attack, which used much larger charges and started fires and blew out windows across Lebanon.

              Well, I’m sorry to hear that Lebanon’s glazers just got several months of guaranteed work, I guess, but I’m otherwise not sure why this is relevant.

              And anyway, a single example isn’t going to assuage anyone who has been reading reports of women and children dying from the attack.

              What reports?

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            The mental gymnastics people will do to defend literal state sponsored terrorism.

            And don’t waste your time, I actually know what those words mean.

            • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Yes, it’s pretty shocking how people have come out in support of an Iranian-funded terrorist group that has killed women, children, and a hundred Americans

        • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Several of the victims were children.

          The fathers of these dead children will simply have to live with the terrible consequences of their involvement with antisemitic terror (who are we kidding, they don’t care.)

          They went off in crowds.

          In every such case only the agent was harmed. You’re proving how targeted the attack was.

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yup, and it seems like more and more that it wasn’t explosives, but regular pagers tampered with to explode using parts they already contain as to not arouse suspicion.

    It will be interesting to see how this impacts the reputation of Western electronics. There’s already unverified reports of Middle East markets abandoning western built phones end masse for Chinese ones.

    Also wait until this technique gets into other malicious actors hands and we start seeing this attack happen everywhere. I don’t think Westerners understand what a Pandora’s box they’ve opened.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    All you have to do to realize that this is a terrorist attack is to close your eyes and imagine the media response if Hezbolah did this to the IDF.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      If they did it to the IDF, I doubt many would have an issue with it. Military is always a valid target in war.

      If it was done to random civilians, then most would.

      It all hinges on just how targeted the attack is, and how much you believe Mossad’s claims that it was all Hezbollah. We’ve seen their claims on bombing Hamas militants, and I doubt everyone in those 8 floor residential buildings were all Hamas members.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Doubt.

        If they had snuck explosives into cell phones of IDF soldiers and then detonated them in mass while the soldiers were at home with their families it would not be acceptable.

        I totally agree that this attack was indiscriminate. I think part of the point was the psychological impact of being attacked that way. How could you ever feel safe again after knowing anything around you could be a small explosive device.

        It is a huge escalation that will undoubtedly created another huge wave of terrorism. Israel has always been its own worst enemy.

  • xhrit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Encrypted communications equipment purchased for military use are not ordinary devices, and under international law if a device is used for military transmissions it is a valid target and can be attacked.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      under international law if a device is used for military transmissions it is a valid target and can be attacked.

      I think this means that if an Israeli sells you a phone, they become a valid target for military strikes.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Many were not used by the military and the explosions happened during the day in uncontrolled circumstances. Many civilians got hurt.

      • xhrit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Many were not used by the military

        Why on earth would civilians be using encrypted military grade pagers purchased by a terror organization for exclusive use by it’s members?

  • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    They weren’t “ordinary devices”, they were encrypted pagers manufactured specifically at Hezbollah’s request for their own use.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      “Ordinary device” in this context means anything that does not immediately resemble an instrument of war.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    As if Israel suddenly is going to care about international law. They have been committing war crimes and crimes against humanity for a long time now. This is telling nazis “hey, what you are doing is bad mkay?” like they would give a fuck.

    • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      absolutely. i mean it is not as shitty as cutting of the breasts of women who attended that festival back then. but I do not understand how pagers are “ordinary devices”. what a joke. and why does iranian ambassador have one?

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Just because terrorists are doing horrible acts, doesn’t mean you are free to do whatever you want. Crimes against humanity and war crimes do not have an asterisk saying “except when the enemy commits crimes too”.

        About the pagers, are they specifically made for the military? Or are they commercially available? Just because terrorists use them doesn’t mean no one else does. There are still many hospitals for example using pagers. Does that make doctors terrorists or military?