• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 16th, 2023

help-circle






  • In England at least, you’re not looking long term enough.

    The “top” clubs do change over time. It just happens on longer time frames then you’re talking about and will change again in the future. It usually takes decades but it can happen in shorter time frames.

    Newcastle were a top, top club for a while in the 90s, then they were so shit they got relegated, now they’re a top side again. Spurs were mid-bottom half in the 90s. Blackburn Rovers were Champions in the 90s before it all fell apart. Forest were European powerhouses in the 70s. Ipswich Town won a European Cup also. Leeds were one of the best clubs around and in the “big 6” until a couple of decades ago. Everton have been English champions multiple times. Brighton have skyrocketed into the top-half of the top flight over the past few years.

    Sheffield Wednesday and Huddersfield Town were top teams in the early 20th century. Portsmouth and Wolves were both multi-year champions in the 40s/50s. etc etc.

    The competition now is also much closer than you are saying, Chelsea took their eye off the ball for a few months and plummeted to their worst league position in decades. That wouldn’t have happened if the competition from every club wasn’t so vicious.

    Yes it is much, much harder to “pull a Leicester” as a smaller club, but it’s not impossible, as they showed us.

    Also small bit of pedantry: Chelsea already were a trophy winning, top 4 team before their money. Seems harsh to put them in the same category as City there.


  • It’s not ineffective. It’s just as effective as possession based or tiki-taka if not more. Plenty of teams still utilise route one. When a team needs a goal with little time left they still usually go back to the long ball, because it is effective.

    The problem lies in that it is more risky as well. While you get the ball in dangerous areas faster, your chance of giving it to the other team drastically increases also.

    Possession based takes longer and produces less chances but if you are good at it you can minimise completely your opponents chance to score



  • Are you joking? This is prime football reddit recency dim-wittedness.

    You make this post after the first bad performance he’s had in years.

    James started getting his high rating because he completely shuts down every winger he meets, while also being one of the best attacking full backs in the world. The year Chelsea won the CL their attack pretty much ran through James and Chillwell.

    You can also literally just look back to his last game where Doku was in his pocket the entire time he was on the pitch.

    Gordon hardly cooked him through skill. James having an uncharacteristic error was his only chance tbh

    Ludicrous post.


  • This is a really uncharacteristic performance from him today, but the whole of Chelsea just didn’t turn up, especially their few experienced players. Silva had a mare and Sterling was poor outside of his free-kick.

    Inconsistent performances like that may be the price Chelsea pay the next few years for going all in on youth. James is still under 25 so is an unusually young choice for captain as well.

    I suspect he is really going to blossom into his role over the next few years if he can just stay healthy. I’m hopeful for him with the very carefully managed return he’s had so far this time and with Gusto to share the load more.





  • Tbf Palmer doesn’t have the physical speed of Gordon but he’s actually been really direct for Chelsea, He usually does it more with his passing but he can dribble too as that chance he made for himself dribbling through the middle of Man City on Sunday shows.

    Think Palmer has actually been more of a central player than winger so far as well so I don’t think they’re the right players for comparison either. They could play together in a hypothetical 11, and may end up doing so for England in the future.